Exactly. In my comments I explain why this would not work even if the 5G tower was a decoy device spitting out the virus, let alone spreading it through a radio signal LMAO.
I understand some people's jive with 5G, but what in the world would coronavirus have to do with 5G and how are people even correlating the 2 with each other. A wireless radio signal in no way can cause people to get a biological virus!
I think one theory is that the 5g signal causes stuff to leak through the blood brain barrier making someone infected with the corona virus much worse or something like that. So in that case you'd have to already have the virus and be asymptomatic, so all the virus carriers would suddenly start getting sick and therefore more people would get tested and show positive.
That's the only explanation/theory I've heard that correlates the two that could possibly make any sense.
There's still a heck of a lot wrong with that "theory". It's just radio waves. They're lower wattage than the old school AM radio towers. They don't do anything to your blood brain barrier.
The way high intensity radio waves cause damage to organic tissue is simply heating it up. That's how microwave ovens work. But the intensity of any radio wave is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the transmitter so unless you climb up the tower to get super close to the transmitter, you're not being exposed to dangerous levels of intensity.
5G doesn't work by having more powerful radios. It actually uses less powerful radios in a lot of areas. It works by having more radios more evenly spaced around an area, and then uses a more data dense encoding to transmit more information.
Yeah, the thing is, I never hear any of these "theories" from anyone who can accurately explain what 5G actually even means. Usually, after I explain a little to them, THEN they start to change their story to accommodate the new info I gave them.
I'll have to try and look up the source, but there have been a few experiments with these allegedly "sensitive" people that claim modern radio transmitters make them sick, and they're never capable of saying whether or not an antenna is actively broadcasting or not by perception of symptoms. The prevailing theory at this point is that it's a form of "nocebo"/placebo effect working on hypochondria.
Tell someone who expects to feel sick when exposed to EMF that they're being exposed to EMF and they'll feel sick even if there isn't any EMF exposure at the time.
The 5G towers could not even be some type of false device that is spewing out the virus because on a sunny day the virus would die outside in a matter of minutes due to the sun light. So you couldn't even spread the virus that way.
You are very mistaken and need to ditch the tin foil hat. However with that said, there is something vaguely interesting to note here.
It's actually true that 5G may very well be a path to getting infected with a Chinese virus. HOWEVER, that will be the Chinese government affiliated company Huwaei shipping bad electronics that infect us with COMPUTER VIRUSES or other malware.
The US government at least last I checked drew a hard line and said Huwaei's stuff is not welcome here due to their transparent plans to spy on us and steal all our industrial secrets.
And nothing whatsoever in the above has anything to do with COVID-19, except for the obvious observation that China is not our friend and ally.
Maybe you misunderstood, the radio waves at that amperage can cause sickness with symptoms that are similar to the flu, but in no way can it give you a virus.
That's not true either. Firstly, I assume you meant "wattage" not "amperage". High wattage radio waves can hurt people, but not in the manner you've suggested. It causes the tissues to heat up and if the heat accumulates faster than it can dissipate, there can actually be burn damage.
However, the intensity of a radio wave is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from a source. So if you double the distance from the transmitter, you're now exposed to 1/4th the power.
So unless you're very close to the transmitter, like you've climbed up the tower, you're not actually being exposed to the wattage rating of the tower, but to significantly reduced power.
5G isn't about higher wattage transmitters, though. Most of the transmitters are actually lower wattage, but there are more of them more evenly spaced over an area. The improved data density of 5G is all about the data encoding in the radio waves. They've increased the data density of the signal, not the power of the signal.
It's more like the difference between written English and shorthand than the difference between a street lamp and a spot light.
The only thing I've ever read along those lines had to do with extremely long wave/low frequency ULF transmissions, and those were anecdotal. Even if it's true, 5G doesn't use those. To the best of my knowledge, no one has used those since some military experimentation in the 60's that didn't really pan out and was soon displaced by encrypted satellite communication.
Thing is, we have standards of exposure because it’s known that radio frequency waves can cause disturbances to people’s health. At 300GHz, we’re damn near at microwave levels. This is why there is a need for so many towers because jacking up the reach of these waves would surpass legal levels of exposure to the public.
Even with less power, the density of these waves have been shown to give people headaches, upset stomach, lack of concentration and more when they are close to towers. Granted, the average joe doesn’t feel anything, but it does effect some negatively. From what I’ve gathered, there is a delicate balance between the amount of power as correlated to the density of the wave. Caps and limits have been tweaked for 5G because they are known to be detrimental to the human body at certain levels.
You're confusing two types of Hz. One is the frequency of the carrier wave, the other is the speed at which bits of information are passed. 5G does not operate at 300gHz radio frequencies.
The radio frequencies used for 5G are either "low band", around 600 mHz the same as 3 and 4 G, "mid band", 2.4 to 4.2 gHz (this is the most common), or "high band", 24 to 72 gHz. This is no where near microwaves.
However, the higher the frequency, the LOWER the penetrative capability. Higher frequency radio waves can't travel through walls, OR people as well as lower frequency radio waves. That's why there has to be more radios rather than more powerful radios.
None of the claimed side effects you've mentioned have been proved in experimental situations. Quite the opposite, people claiming to be "sensitive" to electromagnetic radiation have frequently failed to demonstrate any ability to distinguish whether an antenna was broadcasting or not in a blind test.
We have regulations because A) high wattage radio can cause injury if you're too close to the transmitter as I've already said, and B) because multiple transmitters in the same or similar frequency bands will interfere with each other.
Every single frequency band is allocated and has already been in use. The reason regulations had to change was to allow 5G carriers to use frequency bands that were already allocated and in use for other purposes. They had to deconflict the spectrum.
For instance, the 2.4 gHz band was already in use for maritime radio navigation. It would create safety issues if near-ocean shore-based 5G transmitters interfered with maritime navigation equipment in the ports and harbors.
You. Are. Retarded. Get. Help.
Exactly. In my comments I explain why this would not work even if the 5G tower was a decoy device spitting out the virus, let alone spreading it through a radio signal LMAO.
What do you think 5G is?
Well obviously it's a secret death ray developed by the Chinese.
And here I was thinking it was a mind-control ray invented by the subterranean lizard people.
People around here thought they already had 5G from the cable company, because they could connect to SSID XXXX or XXXX-5G on their wireless router.
Idiots.
I understand some people's jive with 5G, but what in the world would coronavirus have to do with 5G and how are people even correlating the 2 with each other. A wireless radio signal in no way can cause people to get a biological virus!
I think one theory is that the 5g signal causes stuff to leak through the blood brain barrier making someone infected with the corona virus much worse or something like that. So in that case you'd have to already have the virus and be asymptomatic, so all the virus carriers would suddenly start getting sick and therefore more people would get tested and show positive.
That's the only explanation/theory I've heard that correlates the two that could possibly make any sense.
There's still a heck of a lot wrong with that "theory". It's just radio waves. They're lower wattage than the old school AM radio towers. They don't do anything to your blood brain barrier.
The way high intensity radio waves cause damage to organic tissue is simply heating it up. That's how microwave ovens work. But the intensity of any radio wave is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the transmitter so unless you climb up the tower to get super close to the transmitter, you're not being exposed to dangerous levels of intensity.
5G doesn't work by having more powerful radios. It actually uses less powerful radios in a lot of areas. It works by having more radios more evenly spaced around an area, and then uses a more data dense encoding to transmit more information.
I think they were also saying multiple antennas focus on you to give you a higher dose or something.
Not saying I believe this, just what I was hearing someone say.
Yeah, the thing is, I never hear any of these "theories" from anyone who can accurately explain what 5G actually even means. Usually, after I explain a little to them, THEN they start to change their story to accommodate the new info I gave them.
I'll have to try and look up the source, but there have been a few experiments with these allegedly "sensitive" people that claim modern radio transmitters make them sick, and they're never capable of saying whether or not an antenna is actively broadcasting or not by perception of symptoms. The prevailing theory at this point is that it's a form of "nocebo"/placebo effect working on hypochondria.
Tell someone who expects to feel sick when exposed to EMF that they're being exposed to EMF and they'll feel sick even if there isn't any EMF exposure at the time.
The 5G towers could not even be some type of false device that is spewing out the virus because on a sunny day the virus would die outside in a matter of minutes due to the sun light. So you couldn't even spread the virus that way.
You are very mistaken and need to ditch the tin foil hat. However with that said, there is something vaguely interesting to note here.
It's actually true that 5G may very well be a path to getting infected with a Chinese virus. HOWEVER, that will be the Chinese government affiliated company Huwaei shipping bad electronics that infect us with COMPUTER VIRUSES or other malware.
The US government at least last I checked drew a hard line and said Huwaei's stuff is not welcome here due to their transparent plans to spy on us and steal all our industrial secrets.
And nothing whatsoever in the above has anything to do with COVID-19, except for the obvious observation that China is not our friend and ally.
I don't know how I feel about the 5G connection to coronavirus, but certainly, if there IS one then we should be able to see it with Dallas
Maybe you misunderstood, the radio waves at that amperage can cause sickness with symptoms that are similar to the flu, but in no way can it give you a virus.
That's not true either. Firstly, I assume you meant "wattage" not "amperage". High wattage radio waves can hurt people, but not in the manner you've suggested. It causes the tissues to heat up and if the heat accumulates faster than it can dissipate, there can actually be burn damage.
However, the intensity of a radio wave is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from a source. So if you double the distance from the transmitter, you're now exposed to 1/4th the power.
So unless you're very close to the transmitter, like you've climbed up the tower, you're not actually being exposed to the wattage rating of the tower, but to significantly reduced power.
5G isn't about higher wattage transmitters, though. Most of the transmitters are actually lower wattage, but there are more of them more evenly spaced over an area. The improved data density of 5G is all about the data encoding in the radio waves. They've increased the data density of the signal, not the power of the signal.
It's more like the difference between written English and shorthand than the difference between a street lamp and a spot light.
Yes, I did mean wattage. It’s also the hertz of the radio wave that plays a roll, IIRC.
Either way, they absolutely can make a person get the sensation of being sick.
The only thing I've ever read along those lines had to do with extremely long wave/low frequency ULF transmissions, and those were anecdotal. Even if it's true, 5G doesn't use those. To the best of my knowledge, no one has used those since some military experimentation in the 60's that didn't really pan out and was soon displaced by encrypted satellite communication.
Thing is, we have standards of exposure because it’s known that radio frequency waves can cause disturbances to people’s health. At 300GHz, we’re damn near at microwave levels. This is why there is a need for so many towers because jacking up the reach of these waves would surpass legal levels of exposure to the public.
Even with less power, the density of these waves have been shown to give people headaches, upset stomach, lack of concentration and more when they are close to towers. Granted, the average joe doesn’t feel anything, but it does effect some negatively. From what I’ve gathered, there is a delicate balance between the amount of power as correlated to the density of the wave. Caps and limits have been tweaked for 5G because they are known to be detrimental to the human body at certain levels.
You're confusing two types of Hz. One is the frequency of the carrier wave, the other is the speed at which bits of information are passed. 5G does not operate at 300gHz radio frequencies.
The radio frequencies used for 5G are either "low band", around 600 mHz the same as 3 and 4 G, "mid band", 2.4 to 4.2 gHz (this is the most common), or "high band", 24 to 72 gHz. This is no where near microwaves.
However, the higher the frequency, the LOWER the penetrative capability. Higher frequency radio waves can't travel through walls, OR people as well as lower frequency radio waves. That's why there has to be more radios rather than more powerful radios.
None of the claimed side effects you've mentioned have been proved in experimental situations. Quite the opposite, people claiming to be "sensitive" to electromagnetic radiation have frequently failed to demonstrate any ability to distinguish whether an antenna was broadcasting or not in a blind test.
We have regulations because A) high wattage radio can cause injury if you're too close to the transmitter as I've already said, and B) because multiple transmitters in the same or similar frequency bands will interfere with each other.
Every single frequency band is allocated and has already been in use. The reason regulations had to change was to allow 5G carriers to use frequency bands that were already allocated and in use for other purposes. They had to deconflict the spectrum.
For instance, the 2.4 gHz band was already in use for maritime radio navigation. It would create safety issues if near-ocean shore-based 5G transmitters interfered with maritime navigation equipment in the ports and harbors.
Not sure where I got the 300GHz.
Either way, they will move to the 5G and beyond. Whatever issues it causes, if any, will be realized at that time.
I’ll say, I’m not too worried, but anything new being broadcast on the public should be scrutinized heavily.