1165
Comments (44)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
TonsOfSalt 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's because they used ARDSnet criteria, and people are starting to realize it's not ARDS but some kind of shunting defect.

1
SnowflakeJuice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dr. seemed to indicate it may be a blood virus that prevents the hemoglobin from transporting oxygen

1
TonsOfSalt 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's highly variable oxygenation with patient position, implying some kind if impaired diffusion capacity, which could mean something like micro embolisms. Prone positioning wouldn't do anything for a process that was purely an impairment of hemoglobin. I'm not saying its not happening, but there it's at least something else going on in the picture