2107
Comments (98)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
8
nowrongwrong 8 points ago +14 / -6

It's the fact that Black voices for Trump are rare that makes them noteworthy.

From a demographic perspective, virtually every sticky is already a white voice for Trump.

12
ViaAlpina 12 points ago +15 / -3

White voices for Trump are obviously present. I mean, without Whites, Trump would have received ZERO electoral votes.

The issue at hand is that Whites are specifically forbidden from advocating for the interests of their community and their children in the same way that other groups are.

Do you defend this double standard?

-2
axrevolutionai -2 points ago +1 / -3

the interests of the white community are different than those of the black community because there is no one unified white culture

Jews, Italians, Spanish, Germans, Brits, etc all have massively different cultures, foods, religions, appearances, etc

One of the reasons t_d got compromised is because it was brigaded by the altright

-7
nowrongwrong -7 points ago +4 / -11

We aren't forbidden, but the unfortunate reality is that we have to deal with the fallout caused by people who abused the platform.

The swastika was a holy symbol in the Far East for centuries. Do you think people are able to still use it post Nazi Germany? Does anyone dare wear a Charlie Chaplin mustache since Hitler?

If you want to advocate for the interests of the white community, you just have to do it without invoking the abuse of the past. No, you can't wear white hoods and burn crosses.

As far as double standards go, consider that the Black Panther Party was dissolved in 1982. If someone were to resurrect it and try to call themselves Black Panthers today, I honestly believe that society as a whole would consider that just as unacceptable.

16
ViaAlpina 16 points ago +17 / -1

Oh, ok, I have to accept open discrimination against my children in education and the job market because of the Nazis.

That makes perfect sense. Really a novel angle you're pushing.

Hmmm, wait, I HAVE heard this argument before. It's the same one the left uses when they want to promote the invasion of our nation by millions of foreigners.

-9
nowrongwrong -9 points ago +4 / -13

Oh, are your kids Asian? Because Asians are actually the ones most likely to be rejected from prestigious universities due to quotas.

You have a serious problem with conflating issues. In one post you talk about "advocating for the interests of a community" and then in the next post you jump to discussing affirmative action in higher education admissions or the job market.

Completely different topics. If you insist on putting words in my mouth then you can go ahead and continue my side of the conversation for me and spare me the notification bells, thanks.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
-4
nowrongwrong -4 points ago +1 / -5

You make good points but there are a couple things I still disagree with.

Beyonce was definitely criticized for that performance, however, you are right to point out that the overwhelming majority of black voices called it justified in order to bring attention to the Black Lives Matters movement. That does seem hypocritical, so I stand corrected regarding "society as a whole".

Black Panther the comic was written in 1966 so I don't think you can really consider a movie by the same name based on that source material a revival.

The guy I was replying to was talking about "children" in the context of racial identity. Being proud of your own white identity is one thing, being proud of having white kids is an obvious dog whistle to "racial purity" and "heritage" proponents.

"It's OK to be white" was a brilliant campaign because it showed how the left invents their own offenses. It was the left that equated "It's OK to be white" to be synonymous with "White Power". That was the genius of it. Exposing the delusion.

But surely you can agree that if people had just gone around printing up signs that literally said "White Power" that would have been an entirely different thing.

-11
deleted -11 points ago +1 / -12
6
ViaAlpina 6 points ago +6 / -0

Without whites Hillary would have received ZERO electoral votes.

What?

If Whites had abstained from voting in the 2016 general election, Hillary would have received ALL of the electoral votes.

1
deleted 1 point ago +4 / -3
1
americathegr888 1 point ago +2 / -1

90% of all minorities and legal immigrants voted for Hillary, dude.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
-1
axrevolutionai -1 points ago +1 / -2

This! and also all whites aren't the same color. Italian whites, Greek whites, Hispanic whites, most of us are not lily white and have slightly darker features. Only in America do we get rejected by other caucasians for "not being white enough"

Seriously, try being Greek or Italian or white Hispanic , going on dating websites, and trying to date caucasian women, plenty will reject you for not being white.

A certain fraction of our movement just wants the ability to be racist even though our Don isn't racist AT all.

Melania is white...she's darker skinned than a lot of Mexicans..skin color racism is outdated and stupid. Plenty of dumb liberal white people make fun of Melania's accent and her skin color...racism and xenophobia need to die

4
minotaurbeach 4 points ago +5 / -1

They keep erasing the black conservative guests Trump invites constantly.

If you have a chance, check out Diamond and Silk. They know their politics, and call out bull, sometimes before anyone notices it.

-1
nowrongwrong -1 points ago +1 / -2

I know who Diamond and Silk are. Their tweets made front page on T_D Reddit many times, I don't see why they would be erased.