21
posted ago by L0GICAL_V0TER ago by L0GICAL_V0TER +21 / -0

Am I the only one who thinks they should be providing weekly Recovery stats and projections along with all of the other stats they are putting out?

Comments (4)
sorted by:
4
BlueStateRose 4 points ago +4 / -0

It won’t be accurate though, because there are so many people who’ve likely had it and were never tested. I have a very close friend in that group.

2
GamerPepe 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://infection2020.com/

Shows recovery, and admits they are probably very low due to low reporting on recovery stats.

1
Deplora 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can see where it would be difficult and cause a lot of debate without any real benefit. How do you define "recovered"? Testing negative for the virus? A lot of people who had severe symptoms may still have some disabling after-effects for a while, especially related to pre-existing conditions which most of them had, so when to count somebody as "recovered" would be very fuzzy.

1
L0GICAL_V0TER [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Use the confirmed cases we have. That seems to be what they are basing all of it on.....