Releasing classified information about anything would disprove Q because that would be illegal.
We have seen plenty of that on the other side. Comey, McCabe, etc.
I don't want to draw derision for pointing this out. I am simply stating a fact.
Q's purpose isn't to release classified info. The POTUS has the authority to declassify everything. The POTUS has had this authority since he won the job. The question then becomes why hasn't he done it yet? There could be a number of reasons.
What if Q's purpose is multifaceted? What if it is outlining an ongoing process and disseminating info and communication to people outside the usual routes and out of the control of the corrupt media? Does the media actually ever really present new info? Or do they just tell us what to think? Or cause us not to think at all? What if this communication is also directed at enemies on every level? If that was the case, wouldn't you want it to be obscure? Wouldn't you want it to keep your enemies on edge all the time? Why do we see former intel leaders shitting their pants on social media websites? Same with a bunch of celebrities? Maybe coax them into making mistakes? Exposing their ugliness more and more?
Think about all of the events from the election to now. Hasn't it been a "slow drip" of info? I mean... They impeached the president after their own corruption was further brought out into daylight. Think about that.
These are just thought exercises I am engaging in. But also... Isn't "Q" a pretty badass idea? A cool brand? Who is good at branding? Hmmm
I have considered that some of Q’s purpose has been stress-testing the country’s preparedness in the event of Trump dropping the hammer on the Deep State, which is what everyone wants and is what would need to happen to take down this cabal. Remember that the NSA is monitoring everything and Trump is now the one with the ability to get FISAs on his enemies. So let’s say you float the idea that a guy like Podesta is going to be arrested on such and such a date, and then you monitor his comms. Won’t that give you a lot of information on what his plan is and who he’s working with? You spook him, and then see how he reacts. Similarly, we have all noticed the pattern of bad news for the Democrats breaking or about to break, and all of a sudden there is a public shooting or other event that hijacks the news cycle. Could misinformation not be used to force your enemy to empty all their ammo too early by faking them out? Because a lot of these false flag type of attacks probably involve some amount of planning. Charlottesville, for example, was probably in the works for a few months at least. So it would make sense to try to get your enemy to waste his ammo while you keep all of yours dry. Also, you could monitor the chatter and try to get ahead of some of these false flags by seeing who is contacting who and what they are saying. This might even be a good way to stop the false flags entirely. Like I don’t believe there has been a major school shooting since Parkland, right? Over two years ago? Maybe President Trump actually figured out how those were being called in and put a stop to it. There are a lot of possible angles to consider. And none of this means anyone HAS to believe in Q. But nobody should be so aloof and pretend there would be no strategic value in a communications back channel that both your supporters and your enemies could read. Remember in WW2 when they would crack a Nazi code, they wouldn’t immediately make a move that made it obvious to the Nazis that the code had been cracked. Better to make them think the code still works so you can continue to decipher their secret messages.
Releasing classified information about anything would disprove Q because that would be illegal.
We have seen plenty of that on the other side. Comey, McCabe, etc.
I don't want to draw derision for pointing this out. I am simply stating a fact.
Q's purpose isn't to release classified info. The POTUS has the authority to declassify everything. The POTUS has had this authority since he won the job. The question then becomes why hasn't he done it yet? There could be a number of reasons.
What if Q's purpose is multifaceted? What if it is outlining an ongoing process and disseminating info and communication to people outside the usual routes and out of the control of the corrupt media? Does the media actually ever really present new info? Or do they just tell us what to think? Or cause us not to think at all? What if this communication is also directed at enemies on every level? If that was the case, wouldn't you want it to be obscure? Wouldn't you want it to keep your enemies on edge all the time? Why do we see former intel leaders shitting their pants on social media websites? Same with a bunch of celebrities? Maybe coax them into making mistakes? Exposing their ugliness more and more?
Think about all of the events from the election to now. Hasn't it been a "slow drip" of info? I mean... They impeached the president after their own corruption was further brought out into daylight. Think about that.
These are just thought exercises I am engaging in. But also... Isn't "Q" a pretty badass idea? A cool brand? Who is good at branding? Hmmm
I have considered that some of Q’s purpose has been stress-testing the country’s preparedness in the event of Trump dropping the hammer on the Deep State, which is what everyone wants and is what would need to happen to take down this cabal. Remember that the NSA is monitoring everything and Trump is now the one with the ability to get FISAs on his enemies. So let’s say you float the idea that a guy like Podesta is going to be arrested on such and such a date, and then you monitor his comms. Won’t that give you a lot of information on what his plan is and who he’s working with? You spook him, and then see how he reacts. Similarly, we have all noticed the pattern of bad news for the Democrats breaking or about to break, and all of a sudden there is a public shooting or other event that hijacks the news cycle. Could misinformation not be used to force your enemy to empty all their ammo too early by faking them out? Because a lot of these false flag type of attacks probably involve some amount of planning. Charlottesville, for example, was probably in the works for a few months at least. So it would make sense to try to get your enemy to waste his ammo while you keep all of yours dry. Also, you could monitor the chatter and try to get ahead of some of these false flags by seeing who is contacting who and what they are saying. This might even be a good way to stop the false flags entirely. Like I don’t believe there has been a major school shooting since Parkland, right? Over two years ago? Maybe President Trump actually figured out how those were being called in and put a stop to it. There are a lot of possible angles to consider. And none of this means anyone HAS to believe in Q. But nobody should be so aloof and pretend there would be no strategic value in a communications back channel that both your supporters and your enemies could read. Remember in WW2 when they would crack a Nazi code, they wouldn’t immediately make a move that made it obvious to the Nazis that the code had been cracked. Better to make them think the code still works so you can continue to decipher their secret messages.