843
Comments (29)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
4
MarySmith 4 points ago +4 / -0

Please stop. You are making too much sense!

3
cluckingducks 3 points ago +3 / -0

Same old story. Garbage in, garbage out. You can shake, stir, and toss the data all you want, but if you don't have enough, you will never make a salad

It's becoming an every day problem. Arrogant motherfuckers making grandiose predictions while relying on a thimble full of data. It's pathetic, really.

3
sixfingerdildo 3 points ago +3 / -0

modeling of celestial bodies is remarkably accurate considering the 17th century theory and math involved.

this "pandemic" model consisting only of data plots, best fit curves and extrapolation shouldn't be called modeling at all. just like climate change "models".

1
TwoCurvedHollowFangs 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let’s be real - these models were shit. Mostly because CHY-na skews data and underreported, but also because democrats and democrat governors see an opportunity here. Keep the economy ground to a halt until a November election . Sounds ridiculous, right? What sounds more ridiculous: jumping on this virus and choking the economy to get a shot in November, or allowing Joe Biden to get on stage with Donald Trump in a debate? You watch. Joe will be gone before the first debate.