Well that's sort of my point. The post itself is misleading and doesn't accurately reflect what is in the actual study that's linked. Accuracy is a good thing.
Given that the fatality rate of this disease without medication might be anywhere from .5% to a few percent, depending on who you listen to. The difference between a 98% cure rate and a 99.5% cure rate is actually a big deal.
Yes, but as those 16 patients are not yet cured, you can't say the cure rate is 99.5%. The ultimate cure rate will be somewhere between 98 and 99.5%.
The abstract doesn't, only the OP did so hardly relevant.
Well that's sort of my point. The post itself is misleading and doesn't accurately reflect what is in the actual study that's linked. Accuracy is a good thing.
Given that the fatality rate of this disease without medication might be anywhere from .5% to a few percent, depending on who you listen to. The difference between a 98% cure rate and a 99.5% cure rate is actually a big deal.
You got 'em bro sick fucking burn. How dare xe say that 99.5% are cured when its really 98%.
What an asshoe.
Grow up.