651
Comments (21)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
11
ChuckedBeef 11 points ago +13 / -2

The models were wrong. People haven't been social distancing nearly as much as advertised.

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
5
poop 5 points ago +5 / -0

60,000 vs 120,000 that is a difference of .015 % of the population

... The prediction was off by 50-100%. That is an ABYSMAL projection. If an analyst in the private sector came up with models this bad for business forecasts they'd be fired.

I'm glad we will never find out.

I'd take my chances over 16 million MINIMUM unemployed in a matter of weeks with no end in sight, and any last notion of the idea that we have even a modicum of freedom torn to shreds.

You're pathetic and you deserve what's coming.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
5
nocucks 5 points ago +6 / -1

Two weeks ago the models said 2 million. Now its 60,000.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4