2509
Comments (139)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
93
sun_wolf 93 points ago +94 / -1

HCQ has been on the market for 70 years but that’s not enough data for Fauci. He wouldn’t want to be reckless and prescribe a drug that’s only been in use for 70 years. But Bill Gates rushes a vaccine to market in a few weeks, sticks microchips in it, and then tests it out on a couple dudes in a study he himself pays for, and as long as no side effects show up in that first year, Fauci is all cool with it. What are the long term effects of injecting microchips into a human being’s bloodstream? Should that be a concern? Fauci is clear on this: Shut up dummy, you’re not a scientist. Listen to the expert. The Great Faucini knows for certain there is no problem with microchips in the bloodstream because it was ok for the first couple months.

33
LarsOfTheMohicans 33 points ago +34 / -1

It has nothing to do with “safety.” Most doctors are bought out by one pharma Corp or another. The reps hid it a lot of times with non-financial perks (golf outings, meals, trips, etc...). I know because my parents are caterers that cater a lot of these pharma rep lunches. They feed literally the whole office several times a week. In fact, you usually can’t get a meeting if you don’t bring a gift. It’s like the mob. Anyways, no pharma companies stand to make any profit on selling a generic drug, so the doctors know they won’t be courted by the reps. So now they’re pushing for a complicated anti-viral and vaccine that can be trademarked and sold for $2500/dose. It’s all so god damn corrupt it’s ridiculous.

8
decaptcha 8 points ago +8 / -0

Didn't they make it illegal for the reps to give away pens and other similar swag with the pharma corp/drug logo printed on for the same reason? It doesn't seem like it helped.