3185 When the Failing @nytimes or Amazon @washingtonpost writes a story saying “unnamed sources said”, or any such phrase where a person’s name is not used, don’t believe them. Most of these unnamed sources don’t exist. They are made up to defame & disparage. They have no “source”... (twitter.com) Trump Tweet posted 1 year ago by goldentomatoes1 1 year ago by goldentomatoes1 +3185 / -0 74 comments share 74 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (74) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 21 ▼ – ThirteenPercenter 21 points 1 year ago +22 / -1 “Unnamed source” can literally be the reporters themselves. Or their cat, or their imaginary friend. permalink save report block reply ▲ 7 ▼ – fear_mongrels 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0 Apparently they allow this in SJW "academic" studies as well. When your evidence is citing yourself you call it an "autoethnography". Then you can talk about the "systemic oppression" like an expert. permalink parent save report block reply
“Unnamed source” can literally be the reporters themselves. Or their cat, or their imaginary friend.
Apparently they allow this in SJW "academic" studies as well. When your evidence is citing yourself you call it an "autoethnography". Then you can talk about the "systemic oppression" like an expert.