Nice, one of the few instances, where I saw the post before it was stickied with lightning speed. That Fox is controlled opposition is not really a secret. The have some good guys, but in general they aren't that much better and they got worse after hiring the swamp.
Such bullshit. Hannity did more to expose spygate than anyone else on the planet. INCLUDING BONGINO. Bongino knows more about it and is a better investigator sure, but Hannity made it a public issue and did not let it get buried.
why bullshit? Learn to read, I said they have some good guys and that includes Hannity, Tucker and some others, but they also hired Donna Brazille and other swamp creatures.
Bullshit that they are controlled opposition, do you even know what that means? A lot of people don't so maybe that's why you aren't making sense. Controlled opposition would never, ever in a million years allowed Hannity to do what he did with Spygate. Controlled opposition is a real thing so if you call something controlled opposition that is not, I am going to call bullshit on you.
Saying they have some good guys doesn't change anything. If you said "Fox News is a mixed bag and there is a lot of Democrat and RINO influence in a lot of their programming."
Or,
" Fox news sucks as a conservative channel with some exceptions. "
Or
"Any channel that hires Donna Brazile loses my confidence"
I wouldn't have objected, I agree with all of these. It is precisely your controlled opposition accusation that I was challenging.
Want to know what controlled opposition is? It is a fake enemy or critic who poses as real threat but is actually on the side and payroll of whoever they're supposed to oppose. They never touch real issues or do real damage, they just exist so that a real enemy with teeth can not or does not feel the need to take up the fight themselves. A good example is Bernie Sanders. He pretends to be the anto establishment candidate who hates the system and will tear it down! But truly he is just a fucking money/power hungry member of the club, playing the role of the disruptor. Why? Why do they go through this every year? Well, most of the base wants someone who will tear down the system like Bernie says he wants to do. If someone legitimate came along with this position they would have no chance of support because all the people who might of are busy worshipping Bernie. It takes them out of play with zero risk because as they have shown, they will do anything to thwart him if he plays his role too well and he always plays along. If Fox News was controlled opposition they would be giving spygate the Pizzagate treatment.
Nice, one of the few instances, where I saw the post before it was stickied with lightning speed. That Fox is controlled opposition is not really a secret. The have some good guys, but in general they aren't that much better and they got worse after hiring the swamp.
Such bullshit. Hannity did more to expose spygate than anyone else on the planet. INCLUDING BONGINO. Bongino knows more about it and is a better investigator sure, but Hannity made it a public issue and did not let it get buried.
Too bad he doesn't work weekends.
why bullshit? Learn to read, I said they have some good guys and that includes Hannity, Tucker and some others, but they also hired Donna Brazille and other swamp creatures.
Bullshit that they are controlled opposition, do you even know what that means? A lot of people don't so maybe that's why you aren't making sense. Controlled opposition would never, ever in a million years allowed Hannity to do what he did with Spygate. Controlled opposition is a real thing so if you call something controlled opposition that is not, I am going to call bullshit on you. Saying they have some good guys doesn't change anything. If you said "Fox News is a mixed bag and there is a lot of Democrat and RINO influence in a lot of their programming." Or, " Fox news sucks as a conservative channel with some exceptions. "
Or
"Any channel that hires Donna Brazile loses my confidence"
I wouldn't have objected, I agree with all of these. It is precisely your controlled opposition accusation that I was challenging.
Want to know what controlled opposition is? It is a fake enemy or critic who poses as real threat but is actually on the side and payroll of whoever they're supposed to oppose. They never touch real issues or do real damage, they just exist so that a real enemy with teeth can not or does not feel the need to take up the fight themselves. A good example is Bernie Sanders. He pretends to be the anto establishment candidate who hates the system and will tear it down! But truly he is just a fucking money/power hungry member of the club, playing the role of the disruptor. Why? Why do they go through this every year? Well, most of the base wants someone who will tear down the system like Bernie says he wants to do. If someone legitimate came along with this position they would have no chance of support because all the people who might of are busy worshipping Bernie. It takes them out of play with zero risk because as they have shown, they will do anything to thwart him if he plays his role too well and he always plays along. If Fox News was controlled opposition they would be giving spygate the Pizzagate treatment.