3577
Comments (225)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
350
deleted 350 points ago +352 / -2
194
JwPATX 194 points ago +194 / -0

Or they’re completely aware and just gaslighting

105
heelsawyer 105 points ago +107 / -2

Probably this. They are really counting on the population being dumber than rocks. Now that everyone is being home schooled by pot heads and day drinkers, it will be even easier.

32
Forgototherpassword 32 points ago +32 / -0

There's no way they didn't know, this guy's been around for 20 years!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tc7FIaVai0c

7
cybertoke 7 points ago +8 / -1

Not to mention, if you look into it, there's a lot of statements from Secret Service members, (male and female) as well as their girlfriends or wives who talk about Joe doing some insanely pervy shit.

25
vote_for_MAGA_2020 25 points ago +25 / -0

Ive been on multiple liberal websites asking commenters to tell me when they will denounce joe Biden and ask that he drop out of the race. I’m sure the majority of the responses I get are trolls, but it’s still hilarious to watch them twist themselves into all kinds of funny-looking knots trying to explain it away.

“Reade’s story isn’t credible! She’s changed her story!”

“It’s only one accusation!”

“There is no pattern of offenses!”

“BUT TRUMP BUT TRUMP ORANGE MAN BAD ORANGE MAN BAD”

20
ClownTamer 20 points ago +20 / -0

Biden has entire reels of him being pervy and creepy. It isn’t a pattern, it’s just opaquely what Joe Biden is like.

I like how they limited who is allowed to corroborate the story too. “We asked people that support Joe Biden if they could corroborate the story, and so far nobody that supports Joe Biden would, beyond him kissing and touching and sniffing and groping and making everyone feel uncomfortable at all times.”

No shit the Biden campaign didn’t corroborate allegations against their candidate.

6
Iridiue 6 points ago +6 / -0

"SHE'S A RUSSIAN ASSET!"

4
Ask_If_Im_A_Cactus 4 points ago +4 / -0

This may be one of the funniest things I’ve ever read

2
Ma5e 2 points ago +2 / -0

Probably? They've been intentional for years

3
NvJohansson 3 points ago +3 / -0

This 👆 they put all their chips in behind this guy who's holding a 2 - 7 offsuit.

But yeah, NYT reporters says theres no basis, so why bother with justice? Fkn tards.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
59
MaxineWaters4Prez 59 points ago +60 / -1

He didn't rape anyone except for the no consensual intercourse, duh!

32
I_LUV_WINNING 32 points ago +32 / -0

NY Times: If we just use a bunch of words and jumble them around the stupid masses will never understand beyond a 6 word sentence anyways.

Its perfect! Print it! But use more than 10 words.

17
deleted 17 points ago +17 / -0
9
OnlySlightlyNaughty 9 points ago +9 / -0

Well notice she very quickly disappeared after he was chosen. If there was any credibility and she cared she would have continued. No, she got her money and moved on.

1
Monzie 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't forget who was head of judiciary when Clarence Thomas was drug through the mud--Joe Biden.

We're at levels of projection and hypocrisy never thought possible.

7
CashMAGA 7 points ago +7 / -0

Most people really do only read the first sentence or so of any headline or article.

News media uses this to tell the "truth" but still mislead.

It's just fake news with extra steps.

5
MagicBeans 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well, it’s not rape-rape, so what’s the big “Whoopi”?

7
talontron 7 points ago +7 / -0

no negative 15

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
ChuckedBeef 1 point ago +1 / -0

It only counts when the DNC spins up several at once, if they just spin up one that's OK you see.