IMHO, if we knew the real numbers, not just Person A knew Person B allegedly with CV, and Person A died, so they, w/ no test, etc., died automatically of CV because they had been around Person B, we would have 1/3 or 1/2 as many deaths that were proximately caused by CV. Or even less, there is no way to know w/o an autopsy, and CDC even stated it didnt matter -- just say it was CV-related, as no one was going to check each death. CDC and WHO are allegedly manipulating the numbers to make it seem like there are more CV deaths, to the point no one is dying of anything but CV anymore, which makes this whole thing very suspicious to me. But what do I know.
IMHO, if we knew the real numbers, not just Person A knew Person B allegedly with CV, and Person A died, so they, w/ no test, etc., died automatically of CV because they had been around Person B, we would have 1/3 or 1/2 as many deaths that were proximately caused by CV. Or even less, there is no way to know w/o an autopsy, and CDC even stated it didnt matter -- just say it was CV-related, as no one was going to check each death. CDC and WHO are allegedly manipulating the numbers to make it seem like there are more CV deaths, to the point no one is dying of anything but CV anymore, which makes this whole thing very suspicious to me. But what do I know.