521
Comments (28)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
25
Chopblock [S] 25 points ago +25 / -0

SUPREME COURT DONS THEIR ‘PUSSY HATS’: “That the Supreme Court would permit a livestream broadcast of any hearing is historic. The purposeful controls of the Court, never allowing video, cameras or live audio broadcasting for their hearings, was always justified around the court never wanting to allow politics and media to shape the serious legal issues being debated. Secondly, and perhaps not coincidentally, during this live-stream session, the Supreme Court is going to be hearing legal arguments after they consolidated a series of cases targeting the financial and business records of President Donald Trump.  The various lawsuits against President Trump are not only going to be heard, they are going to be broadcast.   It doesn’t get much more political than that.”

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/04/13/wow-supreme-court-will-hold-hearings-via-teleconference-and-broadcast-live-audio-of-consolidated-trump-financial-cases/#more-189050

15
TwoCurvedHollowFangs 15 points ago +15 / -0

Call me optimistic, but what type of information would be coming out? If there was anything there, it would’ve already been used. I think a captive audience and the backing of the Supreme Court could be useful to a POTUS trying to a message across.

Really having a hard time believing anything of substance could be found on Trump. He might be the most thoroughly investigated person in history.

12
Chopblock [S] 12 points ago +13 / -1

I could definitely see sensei judo flipping this the same way he did to impeachment.

Also, does this mean we get to hear Sekulow and Cippollone again?

...cuz, uh, that’ll be nice, I guess.

8
TwoCurvedHollowFangs 8 points ago +8 / -0

No thanks. I’d like to hear the SCOTUS Justices address the runaway lawsuits in the courts today by pointing to the ones against Trump in their court and having these flimsy cases that made their ways to the SCOTUS argued in front of the nation. Can you imagine being a respected lawyer going before the court on live TV and explaining “the golden Shower” or “muh 25th amendment” or “muh tax returns” to a pent up nation that has been listening to this same shit for 3.5 years? No thanks. That’ll be career suicide. The new Jester of the courts.

12
Chopblock [S] 12 points ago +12 / -0

Agree, but instead we’ll just get undisciplined and unlawyerly political diatribes just like the impeachment, but this time bearing the impression that it has some stamp of Supreme Court approval, being played on msm newscasts.

The justices won’t shut down the B.S. for fear of looking bad on TV, and may even start grandstanding for limelight themselves.

A shitshow of reality TV in the making, just like impeachment.

2
DArtist51 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed. This could totally work to our advantage and red pill more people.