Take the time to watch this and follow along. It is only my second attempt at making a video and this is the first time I am putting my research out there in the world. I really think it is insane that no one else has made these connections because they are right there asking to be made. It is frustrating though, I made a major breakthrough and found proof of what happened but I can not get the information out there. It is only 30 minutes of time and in exchange you will get concrete and verifiable answers to one of the most important questions of the modern era, who was the source of the DNC email leaks? It is information that can bury the deep state in an incredibly significant way. If we can prove Seth Rich was the source and not Russia, the Mueller probe is exposed as a witch hunt, Stone's prosecution is ruined, the DNC/FBI/CIA are exposed as villians who covered up a murder and used the same lie to attack their political opposition, the DNC is exposed as willing to murder for power, and maybe we could push for a real investigation. We can really, really, start to wake people up with this. People will theorize and follow Qmaps and meme about conspiracies or deep state crimes all day but when I have actual, verifiable proof people laid out in a logical and easy to follow way, no one can be bothered to take 30 minutes to watch it. Prove me wrong Pedes, prove me wrong. This took a lot of work video editing is not a skill of mine.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QgvS8aAwbaI_AtklqYRTO9k7wV1D2lrD/view?usp=sharing
Thanks for the feedback, like I said this is literally the first time I have ever tried to make any kind of movie/video. I figured it would be good to hear the entire story once so that you could follow along and not get confused, and then to just highlight the relevant portions so that they are fresh on the mind whenever I corroborate them with other sources. I worry it might be a bit confusing and hard to follow if it went along piece by piece without hearing the whole thing once first. I could redo it that way and see though.
I think it is valuable to hear Bill's credentials from actual government employees, but maybe it was unnecessary.
Why should it come before? Pacing? Why do you think Ratner needs to come in earlier?
I think Ratner serves one key purpose, she is able to bring Aaron into the mix, and this piece of information really was the missing link.
It explains two key questions that I felt any good theory needed to answer,
A. Why doesn't wikileaks just say/prove it was Seth? They hint at it and strongly suggest it, but they won't ever flat out say it.
and
B. Why does the Rich family fight so vocally against the idea that Seth was the source/murdered by the DNC?
Both of these puzzled me until I understood Aaron's role in all of this. He was an accomplice, he sent the information and password to Wikileaks and knew about it along the way. WL can not say that it was Seth without endangering Aaron, and obviously Seth's parents just want this to go away so that it doesn't come out that Aaron was involved. They murdered her other son over this and they are probably terrified/ have received threats. If the truth where to get out it would do MAJOR damage to the Deep State, they pretty much went all in on the Russian hacker lie. I wanted to convey this in the video, but didn't know how.
That's a really good idea. Intro/outline (tell them what you're going to tell them), body (tell them), conclusion (tell them what you told them). I didn't even think of this.
I guess I just wanted to get one thing across; there is a tape recording in which Seymor Hersh, supposedly, can be heard telling the inside story of what happened with Seth Rich and the DNC leaks. It could be fake, but if it is real he is one of the few people who could actually know the truth. I found evidence that shows it is indeed Hersh on the tape by proving the source he referenced is real. On top of this, I wanted to take every substantive claim that he makes on the tapes to see if I could corroborate or contradict them. Lastly, I wanted to see if his story was able to explain a few of the odd facts that have been used as evidence that Seth Rich was not involved... Why didn't wikileaks just say or prove it was Seth? Why does his family adamantly deny that he was the source?
To my suprise I was able to confirm that it was Hersh on the tape.
I was able to verify (or at least strongly corroborate) the majority of the substantive claims that he made with independent sources.
There was not one claim that I was able to contradict or disprove.
It also perfectly explained the two confusing facts I mentioned.
To me this tape is the key to proving that Seth Rich was the source. The other information is useful for corroboration but my goal wasn't to go through all the different things that have been claimed by various people about this case, my goal was to see if I could determine the truth about what happened. I believe I have, provided one is intellectually honest while evaluating the evidence and if one actually makes the connections I'm trying to bring to attention.
Ok, long post, but here is an example. When it came out that the FBI admitted they were lying and had examined Seth Rich's laptop, I didn't learn anything new. I already knew this beyond a reasonable doubt. How? Well, I had determined this tape was authentic and on it he claims that both the DC police and the FBI handled the laptop. Wheeler, the private investigator, found this out well beforehand but did not draw the right conclusion from his evidence. The DC police gave him a letter telling him to contact the FBI. The FBI gave him a letter telling him to contact the DC Police. So? So, neither agency would do this unless they knew that the other had, at one point, taken the laptop into custody. They just wouldn't, it would make no sense. Imagine if the DC Police never saw or took his laptop, how would they respond to this request? They would probably simply decline to comment, or possibly state that they have never examined or possessed the laptop. They would absolutely not randomly tell him to go the FBI.... it just doesn't make sense and they would have no reason to do this. The FBI had no business being involved in the official story, none whatsoever. But they wanted to push the problem off on the group that actually accessed the information, so they did. As for the FBI, if they never had the laptop/examined it, they would simply state that this case was not under federal investigation. They might refer him to the DC Police for further questions in general, but they wouldn't point him to them when it comes specifically to the laptop like they did. The only scenario where both the letters from the DC Police and from the FBI make sense is the scenario that Hersh lays out... that the DC Police tried and failed to access it, passed it on to the FBI, and the FBI was able to get in. The only reason the FBI was even on the case is because what they found dealt with a national security issue.
I think that over time more and more will come out about this case that will further verify my information. I also think that there is probably a whole lot more corroboration out there for this in other seemingly unconnected sources. I am one guy with nothing but google and was able to find quite a bit. Just imagine if we got the truth out there to people like Bongino or CTH. With the whole story in mind they could know what information is important and what isn't, they could write an article and we would have thousands of people combing FBI files, interviews, documentaries, etc picking out odd details and information that they never knew was important before to corroborate the timeline.
The problem is that it requires a lot of explanation and logical thinking to truly get how this all comes together. If you have any ideas on how to get this out there or how to make it easier to digest and understand, please keep them coming. I'm already planning on revising it based on your feedback but could use all the help I could get.