Take the time to watch this and follow along. It is only my second attempt at making a video and this is the first time I am putting my research out there in the world. I really think it is insane that no one else has made these connections because they are right there asking to be made. It is frustrating though, I made a major breakthrough and found proof of what happened but I can not get the information out there. It is only 30 minutes of time and in exchange you will get concrete and verifiable answers to one of the most important questions of the modern era, who was the source of the DNC email leaks? It is information that can bury the deep state in an incredibly significant way. If we can prove Seth Rich was the source and not Russia, the Mueller probe is exposed as a witch hunt, Stone's prosecution is ruined, the DNC/FBI/CIA are exposed as villians who covered up a murder and used the same lie to attack their political opposition, the DNC is exposed as willing to murder for power, and maybe we could push for a real investigation. We can really, really, start to wake people up with this. People will theorize and follow Qmaps and meme about conspiracies or deep state crimes all day but when I have actual, verifiable proof people laid out in a logical and easy to follow way, no one can be bothered to take 30 minutes to watch it. Prove me wrong Pedes, prove me wrong. This took a lot of work video editing is not a skill of mine.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QgvS8aAwbaI_AtklqYRTO9k7wV1D2lrD/view?usp=sharing
Thank you for your work, however, don't become a lawyer if you think this qualifies as "beyond a reasonable doubt". Everything you showed was hearsay and anecdotal information.
I disagree. If we are intellectually honest there is literally no other conclusion that we could draw.
I guess you can claim the Hersh made this all up, ignoring the fact that he does have a source who could get him this information and who has been willing to do this in the past. But let's run with that, instead of just utilizing this source he made it all up and it really was Russia. He would have had to have been incredibly lucky to come up with the story he came up on his own.
He would have had to randomly guess that both the DC Police and the FBI had handled the laptop at some point despite nothing but denials of that from the FBI.
He would have had to of randomly guessed that Seth had an accomplice who he entrusted a dead mans switch to, and that the accomplice gave the password to Wikileaks after the murder.
Also, he would also have no reason to do something like this. He was trying to keep this information under wraps. I would also point out that not one statement he made has turned out to be verifiably false. Lucky guy.
When it comes to the other point, if it was Russia, we would have to dismiss Assange's own insistence that it was not, we would have to tell the NSAs top forensic metadata analyst that he is wrong about metadata, and we would have to figure out an explanation for why the FBI took possession of a laptop that belonged to a local murder victim, lied about it for over a year, and are still unwilling to release their internal communications about it. It makes no sense in the botched robbery/Russia hacked them scenario.
Basically, we would have to suspend all rational thought and intellectual honesty to believe that this ridiculous scenario is remotely likely.
The other option is the truth, where everything fits and we do not have to make wild assumptions or ignore critical facts. To me, these alternate scenarios are not reasonable. At all.