"...Baquet’s answer dug a deeper hole, saying the Biden “campaign thought that the phrasing was awkward and made it look like there were other instances in which he had been accused of sexual misconduct.”
So the Gray Lady agreed the many previous complaints against Biden’s touchy-feely conduct were not important.
Another Smith question: “Do you think that, in your heart, you’re reluctant to promote a story that would hurt Joe Biden and get Donald Trump re-elected?”
Baquet gave the classic denial, “I can’t make that calculation.” In fact, the question illustrates the dilemma the Times has created by being so obviously biased against Trump....".
Yeah, I was amazed the other day to hear Governor " Party Tits" brother of Fredo - use the NY Times figure of 84,000 total cases of Chinavirus in China- as a way to claim that the USA has fucked up, by comparison.
China can’t even make toilet seat cozies right. How are we supposed to believe they’re going to test and accurately report Chinavirus cases in a climate where it’d make them look bad?
AK-47s so far as the most effective means of flattening the curve. It’s thought that bullets being injected directly into the brain and key organ sites are the main mechanisms of action.
It's not like they even had a system to do that kind of reporting. Everybody there knows that the government is going to fabricate whatever number most suits their narrative at the moment.
The actual number of deaths will never be known but mass graves and the number of urns purchased by Wuhan funeral homes strongly suggest that 84,000 would be a low estimate of the number of deaths.
If Governor Party Tits and Dim bulb Fredo don't know that then they are more stupid than I thought possible. So the logical inference is that they're lying to advance a political narrative. In time of war.
"strongly suggest that 84,000 would be a low estimate of the number of deaths."
That's the understatement of the century,
"A study by Derek Scissors of the American Enterprise Institute used a conservative model to estimate that the total number of cases in China is closer to 2.9 million, far exceeding the 82,000 the Chinese government claims."
That's exactly the point I was trying to make China wouldn't lie to cover up 84,000 deaths that's a fucking rounding error for them just with Tibet or Muslims.
That Governor Party Tits has no idea of ChiCom history is beyond unbelievable.
At best, Biden has been inappropriately touching women and children (no men, apparently Biden is no homo 😁) for decades. That shows a stunning lack of judgement that he needs to possess if he wants to lead the country.
Granted, I'm all for the benefit of the doubt, but the games they played with Kavanaugh means they must play by the same rules. And they blatantly aren't!
Tbh that's the best part of this schadenfreude. We all know the Tara Reade accusation is probably bullshit, just like we knew it was with Christine Blasey Ford. But the democrats made their bed, now they have to lie in it.
I don't care if it is Fox News... NYT or anyone else... you have ZERO integrity if you change the wording of an article that you published, simply because the campaign thought it was worded too strongly.
That’s the same propaganda outlet Maggie Habermann works at right? So is she speaking out about her employer burying Joe’s rape allegations just like ABC buried the Epstein story?
BTW, we also recall that NBC News killed the Harvey Weinstein story ( on Harvey Weinstein's request ) after Dylan Farrow spent a year working on it - which is why he brought it to the New Yorker.
The last few lines of the article are totally spot on:
"Imagine the paper making changes because Trump’s campaign complained of unfairness.
You can’t, because then they’d have to change the whole paper. Every day."
It wouldn't be the first time for them - they ran a piece admitting this the day after the 2016 election - but it was written by a lower-ranking editor.
Nah hillary had all this stuff planned out and had these people in her pocket the whole time. She was more prepared than Biden is. Hillary's campaign would never have let the initial article and tweet get distributed. I hope this means more NYT libby trained monkeys are starting to wake up.
Showing leaked emails from the Clinton campaign listing all the publications and journalists who could be counted on to print PR from the campaign as "news".
What a fucking joke the NY Times is. On the bright side, in this era of toilet paper shortages, the NY Times still provides at least one valuable service!
Accusers have always had to face a near-impossible choice when deciding to come forward: stay quiet and avoid a public tarring, or go public and have your entire life ripped apart for the minuscule chance that your abuser faces justice. It’s perhaps an even bigger slap in the face to share an accusation and discover that the so-called arbiters of truth in the media are covering for their politician of choice, or that they don’t seem to care at all.
Powerful enough to control the media, so maybe Biden's handlers that you see leading him around like an elderly donkey are just puppets to who is really pulling the strings.
Well, a woman using her real name has made an actual police report and stood by her story for many years. She didn't just make a claim when Biden announced his run.
Biden did this when he was still young enough to force a woman against a wall in his office and forcibly stick his fingers in her vagina.
In a related story, the New York Slimes is set to publish a series of articles on how great it feels to have Joe Biden's hand up your ass. The series will be entitled, "How To Have Fun Being A Puppet" with a related series entitled, "The Best Lubricants and How To Use Them."
"...Baquet’s answer dug a deeper hole, saying the Biden “campaign thought that the phrasing was awkward and made it look like there were other instances in which he had been accused of sexual misconduct.”
So the Gray Lady agreed the many previous complaints against Biden’s touchy-feely conduct were not important.
Another Smith question: “Do you think that, in your heart, you’re reluctant to promote a story that would hurt Joe Biden and get Donald Trump re-elected?”
Baquet gave the classic denial, “I can’t make that calculation.” In fact, the question illustrates the dilemma the Times has created by being so obviously biased against Trump....".
...illustrates the dilemma the Times has created by being so obviously chinese propaganda.
Fixed it.
Yeah, I was amazed the other day to hear Governor " Party Tits" brother of Fredo - use the NY Times figure of 84,000 total cases of Chinavirus in China- as a way to claim that the USA has fucked up, by comparison.
That number, of course, comes straight from CCP.
China can’t even make toilet seat cozies right. How are we supposed to believe they’re going to test and accurately report Chinavirus cases in a climate where it’d make them look bad?
AK-47s so far as the most effective means of flattening the curve. It’s thought that bullets being injected directly into the brain and key organ sites are the main mechanisms of action.
It's not like they even had a system to do that kind of reporting. Everybody there knows that the government is going to fabricate whatever number most suits their narrative at the moment.
Similar to the US Democrat Party and media.
The actual number of deaths will never be known but mass graves and the number of urns purchased by Wuhan funeral homes strongly suggest that 84,000 would be a low estimate of the number of deaths.
If Governor Party Tits and Dim bulb Fredo don't know that then they are more stupid than I thought possible. So the logical inference is that they're lying to advance a political narrative. In time of war.
"strongly suggest that 84,000 would be a low estimate of the number of deaths."
That's the understatement of the century,
"A study by Derek Scissors of the American Enterprise Institute used a conservative model to estimate that the total number of cases in China is closer to 2.9 million, far exceeding the 82,000 the Chinese government claims."
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/beijings-nonsense-coronavirus-stats-are-delaying-effective-global-response-china-expert-warns/
That's exactly the point I was trying to make China wouldn't lie to cover up 84,000 deaths that's a fucking rounding error for them just with Tibet or Muslims.
That Governor Party Tits has no idea of ChiCom history is beyond unbelievable.
The same "newspaper" that let the Clinton campaign edit articles. Amazing.
Mock
YEAH
Ing
YEAH
Bird
YEAH
Mock-ing-bird, yeah
Mock
YEAH
Ing
YEAH
Bird
YEAH
Mock-ing-bird, yeah
At best, Biden has been inappropriately touching women and children (no men, apparently Biden is no homo 😁) for decades. That shows a stunning lack of judgement that he needs to possess if he wants to lead the country.
"Lack of judgement" is putting it kindly. A lot of dads would bloody the noses of the scumbags who grope little girls.
Then again, maybe he gets a free pass on that for the Alzheimers.
Truth be told, Biden was probably groping Cornpop's daughter.
Maybe if they just reported on candidates honestly, none of this would happen and they'd get their candidate.
Liars gonna lie
Granted, I'm all for the benefit of the doubt, but the games they played with Kavanaugh means they must play by the same rules. And they blatantly aren't!
Enemy of the people!
They don't play by any rules. Zero integrity.
For the NY Times to actually play by the same rules - they would have to let the Trump campaign edit their stories on Trump.
I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for that to happen. (:-)
It's an in-kind donation.
https://www.fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/making-disbursements-pac/making-kind-contributions-candidates/
Because removing the truth made the propaganda an ad that has value. It needs to be reported as a donation.
They screeched over accusations. Imagine if there was all the photo and video evidence like there is of Biden! Holy shit!!
Tbh that's the best part of this schadenfreude. We all know the Tara Reade accusation is probably bullshit, just like we knew it was with Christine Blasey Ford. But the democrats made their bed, now they have to lie in it.
Needs to be classified as an in-kind contribution to the Biden campaign.
If only we prosecuted groups of people that acted like a superpac... paging sleeping AGs
https://www.fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/making-disbursements-pac/making-kind-contributions-candidates/
I firmly agree.
I'm sure the DOJ will enforce this any day now.........
At the very least. If they had a shred of integrity they would resign in disgrace.
That's a valid argument.
I don't care if it is Fox News... NYT or anyone else... you have ZERO integrity if you change the wording of an article that you published, simply because the campaign thought it was worded too strongly.
DISGRACEFUL.
Also... go archive the NYT source too.
Imagine if Trump asked the NYT to edit a headline that made him look bad. They'd call him a dictator and claim he's abusing power. Fucking scumbags.
Surely they’ve reported this in kind donation to the FEC. They wouldn’t be dishonest like that, right?
That’s the same propaganda outlet Maggie Habermann works at right? So is she speaking out about her employer burying Joe’s rape allegations just like ABC buried the Epstein story?
BTW, we also recall that NBC News killed the Harvey Weinstein story ( on Harvey Weinstein's request ) after Dylan Farrow spent a year working on it - which is why he brought it to the New Yorker.
Also remember the Wikileaks.
The Democrats have never been disappointed in Haberman's ability to tee up a story for them
Also remember the Wikileaks.
The Democrats have never been disappointed in Haberman's ability to tee up a story for them
Time for them to declare themselves as a DNC campaign organization and be treated as such under the FEC regulations.
The last few lines of the article are totally spot on:
"Imagine the paper making changes because Trump’s campaign complained of unfairness. You can’t, because then they’d have to change the whole paper. Every day."
[✔] Joseph Goebbels liked this.
It’s unbelievable, MSM is basically the propaganda wing of the DNC and they come out and admit it. Enemy of the People
It wouldn't be the first time for them - they ran a piece admitting this the day after the 2016 election - but it was written by a lower-ranking editor.
They did the same for Hillary when she ran. Expect it.
Nah hillary had all this stuff planned out and had these people in her pocket the whole time. She was more prepared than Biden is. Hillary's campaign would never have let the initial article and tweet get distributed. I hope this means more NYT libby trained monkeys are starting to wake up.
My respect for celebrities and traditional media is already so low I don't think how it can go any lower
Now pede don't fret, I'm certain they can disappoint you a lot more.
Glenn Thrush of Politico ran his stories by the Clinton campaign before publishing -- that's what the left does.
https://theintercept.com/2016/10/09/exclusive-new-email-leak-reveals-clinton-campaigns-cozy-press-relationship/
Showing leaked emails from the Clinton campaign listing all the publications and journalists who could be counted on to print PR from the campaign as "news".
Democracy Dies in the NY Times.
Biden campaign editing NYT. Hmmm
What a fucking joke the NY Times is. On the bright side, in this era of toilet paper shortages, the NY Times still provides at least one valuable service!
Asshole abrasions?
Huh? The campaign censored the story and YOU ADMIT IT? M-Kay.
Dear Biden, it's going to come up in debates. Love Trump.
I found a really solid, easy to understand piece for anyone who needs some red pills. https://www.mediaite.com/print/ny-times-deletes-tweet-after-outcry-over-framing-of-report-on-allegation-against-biden/
The best part is the last paragraph:
Pravda is gonna Pravda.
How is this NOT election interference? Hmm? Sleepy?
I call on Schumer, Pelosi, Schiff and fatboy Nadler to investigate at once ! With promptness, haste and resolve !
Let them not tarry nor loiter !
It took until paragraph 31 before they started discussing it. Very, very few will read that far.
Or, in other words, Obama no longer wants to remake America now that HE has $50 million at stake?
Obama never wanted to remake America. He more or less carried out Bush's policies with the notable exception of Obamacare.
He got paid for Obummercare too.
So the New York times interviewed itself to address the controversy? LMAO!!! Gee, trying to control the narrative much?
It’s not like anyone didn’t know the NYT is on Team Biden. That is a garbage newspaper.
I'm SURE President Trump won't bring this up in debates.... nope.. not a chance.
tee hee heee
ok, then Brad Parscale should be able to censor any stories on Trump. NYT will simply be blank from now on.
What's grandpa Joe's affiliation with comet ping-pong?
Creepy Joe Biden's nameless handlers.
Powerful enough to control the media, so maybe Biden's handlers that you see leading him around like an elderly donkey are just puppets to who is really pulling the strings.
Maybe Obama is pulling the strings - the late endorsement is supposed to "throw us off the trail".
"democracy dies in darkness"
Well, a woman using her real name has made an actual police report and stood by her story for many years. She didn't just make a claim when Biden announced his run.
Biden did this when he was still young enough to force a woman against a wall in his office and forcibly stick his fingers in her vagina.
In a related story, the New York Slimes is set to publish a series of articles on how great it feels to have Joe Biden's hand up your ass. The series will be entitled, "How To Have Fun Being A Puppet" with a related series entitled, "The Best Lubricants and How To Use Them."
That's your fault