As commented below the % party split is drastically off and no MoE used, plus only online self selected- massive red flags. That alone would have me toss this in the trash regardless of results- and any viable honest polling company or media requesting the poll would do the same.
Additionally 125 of 857 are up front about not likely voters and should have been broken out or removed from the voting question results. Not doing so badly taints the percentages.
Next we have a very unusual weighting heavily to South region- last time I saw this done was the last Clinton survey they gave public access to the raw data- July 2016- and they then claimed she had 84% of the vote nationwide. It was dragged hard, and they stopped providing data to analyze post.
Finally, they not only gave a whopping 29% weighting to 18-34, they list 15% for 35-44... then ALSO deceptively combine the next two 10 year groups into one with a measly 33% for all; this wildly skews away from known reliable voters and towards those far less likely even when they claim they will vote.
Anyone at all that believes, shares, links, or references this poll is either a fool or trying to feed a false narrative.
And PP may well go the way of 538 in rep and contracts for work if they persist in such dreck being released as valid polling.
As commented below the % party split is drastically off and no MoE used, plus only online self selected- massive red flags. That alone would have me toss this in the trash regardless of results- and any viable honest polling company or media requesting the poll would do the same.
Additionally 125 of 857 are up front about not likely voters and should have been broken out or removed from the voting question results. Not doing so badly taints the percentages.
Next we have a very unusual weighting heavily to South region- last time I saw this done was the last Clinton survey they gave public access to the raw data- July 2016- and they then claimed she had 84% of the vote nationwide. It was dragged hard, and they stopped providing data to analyze post.
Finally, they not only gave a whopping 29% weighting to 18-34, they list 15% for 35-44... then ALSO deceptively combine the next two 10 year groups into one with a measly 33% for all; this wildly skews away from known reliable voters and towards those far less likely even when they claim they will vote.
Anyone at all that believes, shares, links, or references this poll is either a fool or trying to feed a false narrative.
And PP may well go the way of 538 in rep and contracts for work if they persist in such dreck being released as valid polling.