85
Comments (12)
sorted by:
5
DickTick 5 points ago +6 / -1

Damnit man... giving it to the Red Cross isnt all that much better than the UN or WHO.......

2
LessSwampMoreMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s like when you switch between internet providers. You don’t want to go to the new one but you want the old one to know they lost your business.

1
DisgustedByMisleadia [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

True. But it's the thought that counts. 😃

0
DickTick 0 points ago +2 / -2

Yeayea.. long as the who doesn't get it I'm happy

3
crazyfingers 3 points ago +3 / -0

Funding Christian charities? Chick Fil A has a sad.

3
ChickNorris 3 points ago +3 / -0

I love Samaritans Purse. Every time there's a natural disaster here in the US they are one of the first groups to respond with aid-food, clothing, shelter. Great charity to support.

2
ShitComment 2 points ago +2 / -0

Red Cross? Why not redirect to Planned Parenthood? As Gov Whitmer indicated, it's an essential life saving service! ;)

1
DisgustedByMisleadia [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

username checks out. 😃

Although "ShitpostComment" might be better.

2
ShitComment 2 points ago +2 / -0

Shitpost was already taken.

2
Flptplt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Damn right

2
cricketts_4_freedom 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m glad Samaritan’s Purse is getting something. They just built a bunch of hospital tents in Central Park—and I don’t even think they’re being used.....

0
DisgustedByMisleadia [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Interesting statement in the last paragraph:

According to the Associated Press, the annual WHO travel budget is about $200 million, dwarfing many of its health programs. In 2016, the WHO spent $71 million on AIDS and hepatitis, $61 million on malaria and $59 million on tuberculosis.