Are you saying there is some context where it is OK to violate someones constitutional rights? You clearly dont understand how rights work. Nobody gives or takes those, they just are. The fact you consider rights open for debate shows you lack even basic understanding.
Violation of rights under color of law does not equal the natural limitations of natural rights to provide for the equal right of all others to exercise their equal rights. Your examples are stupid; is it on purpose?
Are you saying there is some context where it is OK to violate someones constitutional rights? You clearly dont understand how rights work. Nobody gives or takes those, they just are. The fact you consider rights open for debate shows you lack even basic understanding.
You waive rights when you break the law. It's up to the people to determine what laws are acceptable for their society.
Violation of rights under color of law does not equal the natural limitations of natural rights to provide for the equal right of all others to exercise their equal rights. Your examples are stupid; is it on purpose?
I was right, you are clueless