Yup. My favorite comment from the article was this one:

I like how they articulate that communicating the number of tests that come back negative may inadvertently communicate a message that is negative. That negative message was stated earlier in the article and was that it might give people a false sense of security. Does that mean that not reporting tests that come back negative would result in a positive message, one where people have a false sense insecurity? How is one negative and the other positive. I think they got them backwards. What it really means is there is no transparency and that they don't trust the public to correctly interpret the data.