436
Comments (30)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
18
4cdarth 18 points ago +18 / -0

Of all the problems they had to deal with, they chose this was priority? And also, such a costly stupid solution. Would have been cheaper to have a police officer stationed there if it was that big of a deal.

11
ShrikeDeCil 11 points ago +11 / -0

Highway departments have sand sitting around by the ton, a load or two is honestly not that expensive ... if you neglect, of course, all the labor (you're going to bill the Feds for) and the sand (that you're also going to bill the Feds for).

So ... "Free" from a particular viewpoint. Until, of course, 100 kids wander off with 50lbs apiece a couple times.

9
MarySmith 9 points ago +10 / -1

It will make the park more sleepable and poopable.

12
MJ85 12 points ago +12 / -0

The stray cat population just found their Shangri-La.

4
AceOfTrumps 4 points ago +4 / -0

kids stealing the sand

That would probably save money, considering the alternative is to pay to have it removed. However, the idea of kids stealing sand is comical... a new home owner looking to build a brick patio, ...or a sand pit for their kid maybe would steal it.

3
RapidAsparagus 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's not about kids stealing sand. It's about kids removing sand.

2
AceOfTrumps 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Wandering of with " just gave me a chuckle because I'm imagining some kids actually showing up with a wheelbarrow and shovels... like a job lol

3
Tallsie 3 points ago +3 / -0

How much will the buildings the kids burn down instead of skating cost?