2684
Comments (73)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
45
WhateverNecessary 45 points ago +45 / -0

That's the sticking point. Their entire philosophy about traditional society is that normal people can't prosper. All our small industry and business makes them seethe, constantly reminding them their cause is a lie.

23
thuggishruggishtrump 23 points ago +23 / -0

Muh capitalism

7
K-Harbour 7 points ago +7 / -0

Liberalism is “social capitalism”. Meaning, a few at the top have all the wealth of being rulers over a sea of equal peons. Pelosi, Waters, Feinstein, Schumer — these are the capitalists of the social justice world.

5
CQVFEFE 5 points ago +5 / -0

Liberalism is “social capitalism”. Meaning, a few at the top have all the wealth of being rulers over a sea of equal peons. Pelosi, Waters, Feinstein, Schumer — these are the capitalists of the social justice world.

Oligarchy: a small group of people having control of a country, organization, or institution

Plutocracy: a country or society governed by the wealthy

So, blending these two, we get PLUTOLIGARCHY, a word I just now made up for this comment. That's basically what you describe above. IMHO it's a little more accurate than "capitalism" :)

1
clueless_expert 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s not that the don’t want normal people to prosper, they want prosperous people to be hurt and no longer continue to prosper.