That's a 25% chance of both barrels working or a 25% chance of both barrels failing. Then there is the 50% chance of one barrel working and one failing. Therefore you have a 75% chance of at least one barrel working.
I think this one and the comment 2 above are both correct. You have a 75% chance of it shooting at all, and a 25% chance of it firing both .45 AARP cartridges successfully.
Since some people are confused, this is correct if you want to figure the chances of both barrels jamming at the same time.
For each trigger pull, barrel A has a 50% chance of firing, so lets say you kept track of all the times barrel A fires in a diary. In the margin of each page, you also keep a record of when barrel B fires. Now every time you wrote down an entry for barrel A, there's also an independent 50/50 chance that barrel B fired/didn't fire. So whenever A did fire, half the time B also fired. Similarly, when A did not fire, half the time B also did not fire.
I love it when they fall down the neck of some other guys' jacket. LOL
belted machine guns tend to eject so many rounds (and you tend to be lying down), many of them bounce in every/any direction and you tend to get at least one or two down your neck or bounce off your cheek/helmet. lol fun times.
I made the mistake one time of having an undershirt tucked in and an AR-15 tossed a .223 down my shirt. The burn on my hip where the shirt was tucked in took forever to fade Lol. I was dancing around like a fool at the range trying to get it out
I think it’s more like 170° but yes. For it to be 180° the ejection port would have to be cut to the bottom of the barrel. Though I guess you did say it was a 180° ejection port, not that the casings could eject at 180° lol
But to a well armed & well off gun nut, this could be a nice conversation piece.
I once had the opportunity to purchase a beautifully hand made made bowie that also had a short (2.5") .357 square barrel on the spine of the knife for my father's b-day.
Very well done - not at all clunky or visually stupid. I did not get it, and have never seen it's like again.
Impractical - who carries a 15" single shot bowie knife?
So if a regular 1911 only jams half the time does that mean this one jams all the time? I need a mathmagician over here!
0.5 x 0.5 = 0.25 (50% of the time x 50% of the time = 25% of the time) ...
Lol. You’ll actually fool some people with that madness
It's actually 75% of the time (25% chance to get the good result).
This guy maths.
That's a 25% chance of both barrels working or a 25% chance of both barrels failing. Then there is the 50% chance of one barrel working and one failing. Therefore you have a 75% chance of at least one barrel working.
Where did you get 60%?
Either you have convinced me to take a course in Statistics...or made me renounce math completely. Second cup of coffee, yeah, that’s the next step...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sfqjbFlB2dM
Steiner will help you with the math
I think this one and the comment 2 above are both correct. You have a 75% chance of it shooting at all, and a 25% chance of it firing both .45 AARP cartridges successfully.
Since some people are confused, this is correct if you want to figure the chances of both barrels jamming at the same time.
For each trigger pull, barrel A has a 50% chance of firing, so lets say you kept track of all the times barrel A fires in a diary. In the margin of each page, you also keep a record of when barrel B fires. Now every time you wrote down an entry for barrel A, there's also an independent 50/50 chance that barrel B fired/didn't fire. So whenever A did fire, half the time B also fired. Similarly, when A did not fire, half the time B also did not fire.
It breaks down like this:
25% both barrels fire.
50% one barrel fires, one barrel jams.
25% both barrels jam.
75% chances of at least one barrel firing.
Thank you wise mathguru u/Scroon !
I was just doing some lazy calc, not really thinking about it ...probabilities and stuff. Kek!
Lol, seriously though, probability always bends my noodle in ways that other math doesn't. Seems like it would be simple, but it's tricky!
On the plus side now you have 2X the likelyhood of defeating threat of choice
College professor: 50 percent times the ratio of half a reeee equals the square root of fuck Trump.
Student: And that solves the math problem?
College professor: What math problem?
Math is a tool of the patriarchy and has no place in colleges.
Lol!
Somebody giving you free stuff and free money. Just spend until you run out. See, don’t need no patriarchal math.
It's a meme.
My Kimber usually fails to load the last round from certain aftermarket magazines. Has been flawless with the Kimber mags.
Literally two guns glued together.
I feel like you need hands like Shaq to pull both the triggers with one finger.
Edit: Why are there two triggers anyways? You can’t pull the far one without pulling the close one.
Common sense gun laws, of course.
Jerry Miculek can handle it - https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3tEYcUSQDyw
Is that Jerry with the, “Akimbo, Akimbo”?
He's shown proficiency with many grip styles.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=r1jx1TOzxrE
I would strongly recommend firing this weapon while using both hands.
Ripley did it best.
I always laugh at how stupid that gun is
Don’t they make an AR15 like that too?
Yeah forget what’s it’s called
Liberal tears.
The Gilboa Snake.
Is that a semi-semi-automatic, or a semi-automatic-automatic?
Or maybe we should just stick to a scary-scary gun of color.
The "AR-AR 1515," duh! Haha
This is the only pistol approved for when they “Double dog dare you”...
2 Scoops!
Boom boom!
I still want to shoot one.
To be honest, that is the dumbest, most impractical idea for a gun.
So I want one now.....
I love it when they fall down the neck of my T-shirt!
I love it when they fall down the neck of some other guys' jacket. LOL
belted machine guns tend to eject so many rounds (and you tend to be lying down), many of them bounce in every/any direction and you tend to get at least one or two down your neck or bounce off your cheek/helmet. lol fun times.
It’s the fastest way to see someone get topless
I made the mistake one time of having an undershirt tucked in and an AR-15 tossed a .223 down my shirt. The burn on my hip where the shirt was tucked in took forever to fade Lol. I was dancing around like a fool at the range trying to get it out
This is total productivity booster. It's saves a lot of Double Tap overtime work.
Hitman contracts just fell by 50 percent!
The Beretta 92 series has a 180 degree ejection port tho.
I think it’s more like 170° but yes. For it to be 180° the ejection port would have to be cut to the bottom of the barrel. Though I guess you did say it was a 180° ejection port, not that the casings could eject at 180° lol
Never before in my life have I wanted to spend $4,799 - $7,224 USD on something I absolutely do not need.
Did Moe Szyslak make this gun?
https://i.maga.host/ddh70kG.png
I believe the huge bad guy in James Bond Spectre used that pistol.
Also used by Commish Gordon in Gotham TV show.
Good to see that .win is attracting our fair share of autists. Won't have to rely on 4chan for weaponized autism much longer
Does this qualify as one of those PedoJoe "Two Blasts" guns?
https://files.catbox.moe/tops94.gif
I just saw this pistol...dude hit 18 of 20 rounds dual wielding in 1.5 seconds
Miculek
Seems totally impractical and pointless.... How do I buy 2?
Of course!
But to a well armed & well off gun nut, this could be a nice conversation piece.
I once had the opportunity to purchase a beautifully hand made made bowie that also had a short (2.5") .357 square barrel on the spine of the knife for my father's b-day.
Very well done - not at all clunky or visually stupid. I did not get it, and have never seen it's like again.
Impractical - who carries a 15" single shot bowie knife?
But I regret to this day not getting it for him.
That is the Scott Steiner of handguns.
The ONLY reason anyone would get this gun is to Piss off Liberials! I'll take two!
My wrist hurts just looking at that.