2306
Comments (38)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
29
hashtag6zer0s [S] 29 points ago +29 / -0

The way I read the 2nd Amendment, it's like this:

Because a well regulated militia is necessary for the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

The constitution makes no reference to some supposition that, in order to own guns you have to be part of a well regulated militia. That's bullshit. Basically the founding fathers stated the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Period.

All gun control laws and restrictions are unconstitutional.

14
deleted 14 points ago +15 / -1
3
Early-Slice 3 points ago +3 / -0

These people are idiots. How could it possibly mean government regulated when at the time we were fighting against a tyrannical government? The founding fathers wanted the government to have very limited power.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
3
barcodez 3 points ago +3 / -0

A healthy breakfast, being necessary to the start of a good day, the right of the people to eat bacon and eggs, shall not be infringed.

doesn’t mean I can only eat eggs at breakfast time.

3
KiltedTailor 3 points ago +3 / -0

But very Legal! Now maybe some Lawyer can figure out that contradiction.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0