Because a well regulated militia is necessary for the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
The constitution makes no reference to some supposition that, in order to own guns you have to be part of a well regulated militia. That's bullshit. Basically the founding fathers stated the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Period.
All gun control laws and restrictions are unconstitutional.
These people are idiots. How could it possibly mean government regulated when at the time we were fighting against a tyrannical government? The founding fathers wanted the government to have very limited power.
The way I read the 2nd Amendment, it's like this:
The constitution makes no reference to some supposition that, in order to own guns you have to be part of a well regulated militia. That's bullshit. Basically the founding fathers stated the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Period.
All gun control laws and restrictions are unconstitutional.
These people are idiots. How could it possibly mean government regulated when at the time we were fighting against a tyrannical government? The founding fathers wanted the government to have very limited power.
doesn’t mean I can only eat eggs at breakfast time.
But very Legal! Now maybe some Lawyer can figure out that contradiction.