640
Comments (30)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
16
308win 16 points ago +16 / -0

Inmates are infected and sick....so your response is to free them? Number one, when the hell did a virus mean get out of jail free? And two, HEALTH AND SAFETY! For public health and safety, letting sick inmates back on the streets is a dumb ass idea. But hey, screw health and safety. Screw the victims and their justice. Screw the public.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
308win 3 points ago +3 / -0

I know that the public doesnt want to pay for it. That is not why the public pays for the service of law enforcement and incarceration to begin with. But to let people out who have committed crimes against the public because they are sick, it defeates the purpose of serving justice to victims to begin with. So what is more important? Save money? Serve the public? Keep the public safe? Serve justice to victims? Its sad that those in charge choose answer: Save money. If thats the case, well then lets ask ourselves, why bother with jails and police officers to begin with? Logic would say, protect the community. But if logic is undermined for a political agenda, you end up with a major mess on your hands. And this is going to be a major mess on their hands.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
308win 2 points ago +2 / -0

Violent or non violent offenders....to me makes no difference. You are an offender because you made someone out in the public a victim. That victim deserves justice plain and simple. And just because there is a virus going around does not magically mean justice for victims goes away. Sadly, a lot of democrats who eye criminal justice reform thinks so....while they scream about injustice all over the damn place.