2869
Comments (237)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-1
Dirk_Diggler -1 points ago +2 / -3

Weird perspective. With $2T stimulus package, and the "projected" 2M deaths, that comes to spending about $1M spent per life saved.

5
CuomoisaMassMurderer 5 points ago +5 / -0

$6T stimulus package. That was just the first shot. And growing.

We have no measure of lives saved. Most deaths have been preventable though. If caring about human lives were even a factor then Governors wouldn't interfere with Drs prescribing medicine. 97.4% reduction in deaths when Trump pills are given to people immediately upon being diagnosed positive.

2
Dirk_Diggler 2 points ago +2 / -0

Have no idea where the downvotes were coming from, but yeah it has the possibility to go out to $6.2T. And you are right, you can't necessarily measure the unknown of deterence. I was simply stating, that if the "projections" were correct the cost spent on the lives "saved" would come out to spending a cool million for each life "saved." Even more at the 6.2T level.

My "point" from this perspective was the incredible economic impact this has caused, is at crazy proportions. Not that it necessarily and literally spent dollar for dollar the way I was looking at it, but might has well been.

2
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yup, the only way this makes any sense is a plan to bankrupt US, which is why the Fed was created in 1913. It's also why there's so much push to add to the national debt. That they can simultaneously crater gdp? Makes it look like they're holding all the cards right now, or at least they think they are. We have one way to beat this, and if we act at this juncture it has minimal cost, maximum gains, and long lasting effect. You've seen my action plan?