17
Comments (12)
sorted by:
3
themightykekfish 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think you may be right. It has that subtle mark of the double betrayal they get so hard about.

It def has a phase 1 feel right now

Nice thoughts fren

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
ramseyducati [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ive been kicked for posting my full research. People like you wont be able to go through multiple articles and understand what Im saying so I screenshot to show exact points.

Here

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.economist.com/science-and-technology/2020/02/01/an-american-chemist-is-suspected-of-illegal-dealings-with-china

I dont have the nanotube article tabbed but its in here unless its already scrubbed. They were scrubbing it while I was on here posting so the most efficient thing to do was screenshot and keep looking

https://kiwifarms.net/threads/who-world-bank-gates-foundation-hacked.68634/page-2

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
ramseyducati [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

It gets me mad cause Ive been kicked over it because nobody is gonna read 50 links, i wouldnt. Its hard to post info on here because of that, and all Im doing is researching and posting info. If I could post my IG posts theyre way more detailed and not confusing but I cant here

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Taggart 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok I’ll bite. A reasonable discussion requires sauce. Do you have a link to the nanotube tech and the engineer getting popped? I have seen threads, but all hacking pastebins are empty. So links would be great.

So nanotubes can be made to open and close at frequency. It would be interesting to explore a 5G angle with different resonate frequencies. That might give some legs to your assertion.

Nanotubes and permitivity:

https://cdn.intechweb.org/pdfs/17295.pdf

1
ramseyducati [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.economist.com/science-and-technology/2020/02/01/an-american-chemist-is-suspected-of-illegal-dealings-with-china

Hes a pioneer of nanotech, it was the part of the coronavirus that worried me the most. Got 50k a month for selling tech in wuhan. Got popped either deccember or jan

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
Taqiyya_Mockingbird 0 points ago +1 / -1

I think you can explain things without using insults, that usually yields better results.

-1
ramseyducati [S] -1 points ago +1 / -2

I posted a pic and got insulted. If I posted the link nobody would get to the point Im referencing. Youd have to read either 10 minutes or skim to find exactly what Im talking about.

And I got insulted twice. The relevance of a nanotube is huge, like gigantic. If people dont get that they can do 5 min of research and find out. When someone says something you dont understand you can ask for clarification, insulting them is being mad at your own stupidity. I posted about this 2 months ago, that people dont understand isnt my fault