1880
Comments (186)
sorted by:
141
EDDIT_IS_CUCKED 141 points ago +141 / -0

FUCK OFF, TERRORIST SCUM!

67
IncredibleMrE1 67 points ago +68 / -1

MAKE IRAN PERSIA AGAIN!

26
deleted 26 points ago +33 / -7
15
deleted 15 points ago +21 / -6
2
deleted 2 points ago +11 / -9
11
Crossroads 11 points ago +13 / -2

"You ain't my buddy, friend!"

In all seriousness though, both need a stern frozen boot up the ass.

-6
deleted -6 points ago +3 / -9
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
20
EuropeisforEuropeans 20 points ago +20 / -0

After Alexander it became part of the Western World for a while... Then you know who's from the Arabia came and did what they do best, what they're doing in Europe.

19
iamjohnwick 19 points ago +19 / -0

DEUS VULT

3
Afrikaner_Vrystaat 3 points ago +3 / -0

AVE MARIA

8
WhitePowerRanger 8 points ago +8 / -0

I love how everyone thinks white people are evil, but what is the latest piece of technology, advancement in medicine, or new discovery has ever come out of the Middle East or Africa?

4
Pedeville 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thought me that I dont need weapons to defend myself, just need a truck

2
EuropeisforEuropeans 2 points ago +2 / -0

I know this is old but I totally agree. I mentioned that on jootube and some pajeet told me the English stole the tech from pajeets and squint eyes... right, the pajeets totally had steam power and trains.

Some jogger said something similar, that Africans were advanced but whites stole the tech... that's why they were so easily conquered by Euros and Arabs and fought back with spears.

1
Nikola_S1 1 point ago +1 / -0

The first reusable launch system was made by an Afro-American, for example.

0
Butthurt 0 points ago +2 / -2

Well great advancements in mathematics come from the Middle East a long time ago

9
Rainspa 9 points ago +9 / -0

Pre-Islam, BTW.

5
Harambe 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yup, Muslims conquered peaceful tribes then claimed their advances as their own.

Revisionist history. Savages create nothing.

6
IncredibleMrE1 6 points ago +6 / -0

That was pre-Islam.

4
WhitePowerRanger 4 points ago +4 / -0

Lol if your contribution to current humanity is the pathagoreum theorem, you’re a tad behind the times

3
IncredibleMrE1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Pythagorus was Greek, you bigot!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
PartTimeHick 5 points ago +6 / -1

Even then, classic Persians being depicted as Muslim is Islamic propaganda. Zoroastrians (Ancient Persian religion) are more like pre-Christ christians.

2
Rainspa 2 points ago +2 / -0

Freddy Mercury was a Zoroastrian. Just sayin'.

0
PartTimeHick 0 points ago +1 / -1

Not sure of his case? But if it's what I'm assuming, he's an edgy westerner that can't admit he's a christian.

Ancient Persian was ahead of it's time. It's more like Rome than a caliphate.

2
BurgerChef90 2 points ago +2 / -0

Freddie actually was Zoroastrian, or had a legit claim. His parents were Parsis, who were a ethnoreligious group who immigrated from Persia, to the Indian subcontinent, and the Parsis people were, and are very predominately Zoroastrian.

Sure, he grew up in the British Territory of Zanzibar, now Tanzania, but still had a legit claim to being Zoroastrian.

2
BurgerChef90 2 points ago +2 / -0

Muslims also say Jesus, Moses, Noah, Abraham, and Adam were Muslims. In fact, Islam says they were all the "first" Muslims, even though they lived years apart. Not sure how you can have 5 First Muslims, that kind of defeats the purpose of the word first.

They also say Abraham built the Kabba or whatever. Even though there is no record of Abraham ever going to Mecca.

So yeah, Islam just takes things and makes them their own. Intellectual theft basically.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
2
Fremium2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

That reminds me how much I loved playing this video over the past few years:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGd_se51V5w

Yeah, the nation wasnt perfect, but imagine if they didnt decide to faceplant back to 1345?

1
Afrikaner_Vrystaat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Absolutely based

27
FreeBased1 27 points ago +27 / -0

Reeeee. You can't "shoot down" a gun BOAT. Checkmate, drumpf.

(/s)

21
txladyvoter 21 points ago +21 / -0

You can if you're in a fighter. They can shoot downwardly.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
7
flipping_some_tables 7 points ago +7 / -0

So many Pinocchios....

4
LivebytheTendies 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not enough Pinochets

6
FakeNametag 6 points ago +6 / -0

You can once it is flying through the air because it got BTFO by a deck cannon

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
96
deleted 96 points ago +96 / -0
35
taavofficial 35 points ago +36 / -1

I'm pretty sure it is, he's just letting these idiots know that he won't allow our military to be pushed around.

44
deleted 44 points ago +44 / -0
29
BuyPepe 29 points ago +30 / -1

That pissed me off so much. Imagine being the most sophisticated and highly trained military in the world, ready to bleed for the man next to you, equipped with everything you need to fight the enemy and your commanding officer tells you to quietly surrender?

Fuck that. I’m not risking get mocked, humiliated or worse, tortured by those Iranian scumbags. You don’t join the military to learn how to surrender. Fucking fight the enemy.

10
WhitePowerRanger 10 points ago +12 / -2

As much as I love the military, it’s full of quite a bunch of pussys now. I come from a long line of military family dating back to WW1 and everyone in my family is disgusted at what the military is now.

10
anon1011101 10 points ago +10 / -0

My grandfather occupied Hiroshima 6 weeks after it was bombed, at the young age of 19.
Our society is sissified now.

1
WhitePowerRanger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yup. This. He also probably looked like a soldier and not a skinny bitch. (Not knocking everyone of course. But everytime I see a picture of the military, they’re getting increasingly more and more like how I imagine the team photo from winning the Xbox live halo team tournament looks like

2
Killer 2 points ago +2 / -0

i got out in 2013 I feel like it was perfect timing

6
stillbringingitback 6 points ago +6 / -0

Wars are a lab experiment to find out who was the stronger power before the first shot was fired.

5
Rainspa 5 points ago +5 / -0

We're not French. *note - aquire their wine and cheese at first opportunity.

9
taavofficial 9 points ago +9 / -0

I didn't follow politics during his time in office but I heard stories of how badly he treated our military.

17
deleted 17 points ago +17 / -0
6
anon1011101 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah these assholes in the video could have easily fired an RPG or otherwise caused serious damage to that Navy vessel if they wanted to. A few hundred pounds of explosives on board, full speed ahead, would sink that ship.

15
CQVFEFE 15 points ago +17 / -2

When has it ever NOT been the policy of the US Navy, really, to fire against any attacking or threatening enemy?

Something seems off

55
PoohClimbsTrees 55 points ago +56 / -1

When Obama was in charge.

He let them take U.S. soldiers hostage.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-iran-boats-idUSKCN0UW1Q7

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
31
IncredibleMrE1 31 points ago +32 / -1

Um, 0bama let them do it for eight years without any repercussions, and gave them $150 billion to boot.

https://www.military.com/daily-news/2016/01/13/10-sailors-detained-in-iran-returned-to-us-navy.html

10
OKPoohmer 10 points ago +10 / -0

How much money (CASH) was sent to IRAN?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/us-paid-iran-1-3b-two-days-after-400m-cash-transfer📁

Who controls the distribution of funds?

Who accounts for the funds?

Who has access to the funds?

Who ‘really’ has access to the funds?

Do funds return in the form of political donations?

Do funds return in the form of massive donations to ‘FOUNDATIONS’ and/or ‘INSTITUTES’?

Do funds return in the form of offshore bank accounts for future payments/payoffs?

4
Ithrowawaay 4 points ago +4 / -0

The ultimate cuck.

4
CQVFEFE 4 points ago +5 / -1

That was never the policy of the US Navy, that was the policy of the traitor I have named Foebama.

A foreign communist operative executing a plan to dismantle and destroy the United States.

13
deleted 13 points ago +14 / -1
4
preferredfault 4 points ago +4 / -0

Countries like Iran and China, provoke US ships but in ways they know won't illicit an offensive response. They'll for example, play chicken and stray right into the obvious travel path of US ships and force US ships to change course to avoid potential collision, even if the Iranian vessel was going to move at the last moment anyways. And with the size/weight of ships, there is lag time between movements happening, so a miscalculation on either ships part, can result in an unintended collision.

But the problem with this tactic is that it also allows Iranian vessels to herd US ships in the direction they want, which could be used in a surprise attack or diversion, so it's just bad policy. As long as they know we'll move, they can plan attacks around it.

And Iranian ships regularly do this to vessels in the region. If a collision were to happen and a US ship were to be damaged or sink, it would be very costly for us, while Iran might lose a cheap boat. Then you have to salvage and hope information/hardware from the ship doesn't fall into enemy hands, you have to keep a large presence there to guard the damaged ship, etc. Very costly.

Given Iran's behavior, it's time things have changed.

3
unable_afternoon 3 points ago +3 / -0

USS liberty incident

10
China_virus_Maga 10 points ago +13 / -3

I must have missed the story, What is happening when they say harassing? We just let them harass our ships? Like, are they dropping trou and mooning us? Or are they pointing guns and threatening us?

24
deleted 24 points ago +24 / -0
20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
6
flashersenpai 6 points ago +6 / -0

The transition away from carriers and battleships will be very interesting.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
5
tombombadil 5 points ago +6 / -1

The sole purpose of carriers is to have flight capability. There is a reason why they are always followed by a dozen ships.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
5
tombombadil 5 points ago +5 / -0

I’m old enough to remember when Obama acted like a hero for making the call to sniper Somali pirates that were holding our shippers captive. The fact that doing so wasn’t just standard policy and had to be broadcasted for everyone to see how “strong” Obama was is mind boggling. If someone tries to take hold of your ship, kill them. This isn’t difficult.

57
WassermanSchultz 57 points ago +58 / -1

Eat shit John Kerry.

17
AlphaNathan 17 points ago +17 / -0

L O G A N A C T

9
IncredibleMrE1 9 points ago +9 / -0

That would be cannibalism on Lurch's part. I approve.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
40
deleted 40 points ago +40 / -0
30
deleted 30 points ago +30 / -0
7
Musicbymuzak 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yep. I'm already seeing so many pearls clutched to dust on cuckbook

28
deleted 28 points ago +28 / -0
12
MAGA_Aoyoc 12 points ago +12 / -0

so much this.

Send them directly to hell.

22
Telcontar2012 22 points ago +22 / -0

"Captain, we appear to be taking small arms fire."

"Source?"

"The fishing boat that's been following us for the past ten minutes."

"Fucks sake... Ok, bring us about."

Throws switch.

BRRRRRRRRRT!

"Captain, small arms fire has stopped."

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
19
Jack_Dupp 19 points ago +20 / -1

Fucking A Right.

16
taavofficial 16 points ago +16 / -0

If there's one thing you don't wanna fuck around with, it's the American Navy.

8
txladyvoter 8 points ago +8 / -0

Well....that's a deep six subject!

14
Shakakka99 14 points ago +14 / -0

So if he destroys our enemies, they win right?

CHECKMATE Drumpf.

13
ripturntle 13 points ago +13 / -0

Who would win: a few bomby boys in speedboats with mounted rockets and guns? Or the sole naval superpower since 1945?

7
LtColVindmansVagina 7 points ago +7 / -0

Who would win:

A bunch of idiots that are conducting terrorism, sabotage and extortion at every level to try and achieve technology the rest of the world achieved 80 years ago bois.

OR

An entire Navy literally made of nuclear bois

11
MrTrumpsWildRide 11 points ago +11 / -0

When you click a link to a Trump tweet, twitter scrolls it off the top and moves you down to all the screechers crying about it and you don't actually see the tweet unless you scroll up.

Does this treasonous faggot-built site do that for any other tweets?

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
TehAgent 4 points ago +4 / -0

I deleted my twatter account. If it werent for subs for some of the games I play being quite active I would delete Reddit too. As it stands Ive been comparing the forums and the subreddit to see if I can just use the forums still or if everyone has migrated.

3
MrTrumpsWildRide 3 points ago +3 / -0

Incompetence was going to be my next guess.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
8
VelvetFoot 8 points ago +8 / -0

I like the image of "shoot down" their boats. Like, to the bottom of the sea.

8
Mainwar 8 points ago +8 / -0

ABOUT MOTHERFU*king TIME! GO Navy!

7
txladyvoter 7 points ago +7 / -0

GO NAVY!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
RighterThanU 7 points ago +10 / -3

Curious what prompted this statement. I’m wondering if this is designed to drive oil prices up, or the the context of current oil situation, rescue oil prices from a complete collapse.

14
2
RighterThanU 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks. Missed that report. Can't stay up on everything I guess.

2
txladyvoter 2 points ago +2 / -0

The 24 hour news cycle means nobody ever can for sure.

7
SnipedYou 7 points ago +7 / -0

If only more people understood that strong Foreign Policy can be used as a deterrent. Enemies should not feel emboldened to harass.

7
RiverFenix 7 points ago +8 / -1

Maybe he meant Gunship: Unsure..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunship

Either way, wouldn't be surprised if Iranian Airforce is made up of Boats with wings strapped to them, or their Navy made up of old water planes that can't take off.

0
deleted 0 points ago +4 / -4
2
RiverFenix 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, but if you're paying attention he also said "Shoot down", which is typically a term used on aircraft.

Boats tend to be Sank/Sunk.

Hence my post saying 'I think he meant' .. A Gunship and a Gunboat are easily mistaken considering boats are sometimes called ships..

Now If he would have said GunYatch...

5
rubberkidney 5 points ago +5 / -0

seems totally valid to me. what happens to a ship when it gets destroyed does it go up?

3
RiverFenix 3 points ago +3 / -0

Up in Flames or Up in smoke?

-2
deleted -2 points ago +2 / -4
7
barc 7 points ago +7 / -0

Your move ayatollah. Put up or shut up.

6
SomeGuyOnTheInternet 6 points ago +6 / -0

How was that not always the policy? I would have thought after the USS Cole standard policy would be to fuck up anyone who got too close.

6
MAGA_Aoyoc 6 points ago +6 / -0

FUCK OFF IRAN!!!!

DIE BITCHES!!!

6
UndeadRevolver 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hit em with that death ray that feels like they're on fire and make them swim home. Post video for lulz.

6
Tonightm01 6 points ago +6 / -0

Did you see the video?

The navy let those fucking assholes get so close to a navy ship that they could have starting talking to each other. Without the need for a radio.

Should not have been allowed to even happen.

3
MarySmith 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yea, it was all up alongside, with bearded hajjis all "arr beeedarrr prepare to board" wtaf and smdh.

5
The_Emperor 5 points ago +5 / -0

Our adversaries would be mistaken to poke around us thinking we are a wounded creature. We've merely taken a little rest, but our eyes are open and our teeth are sharp.

5
TehAgent 5 points ago +5 / -0

What is this sticky lottery I cant seem to win? Posted this 20 minutes before you did.

5
DickTick 5 points ago +5 / -0

Holy fuck....

5
remember1776 5 points ago +5 / -0

'BOUT TIME, MFERs

5
SimplePede 5 points ago +5 / -0

Fuck around find out

5
AlphaNathan 5 points ago +5 / -0

no MSM, straight from the source!

5
TheBlueWhale 5 points ago +5 / -0

About time.

Get anti-nuclear missiles ready too. They are still slow enough to intercept.

Fucking towel heads.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
MAGA_100X 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm not up to speed, is this harassment constant, and is there a recent controversy around it?

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
grenades_and_ham 5 points ago +5 / -0

Now do Chy-Nah!

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
sagebrushfire 3 points ago +3 / -0

I always think it’s hilarious when I see their little bathtub, toy “navy” zip around our warships. Even one of our supply ships could turn them all into smoking ruins within minutes yet 5th Column organizations like MSNBC keep sending out dire warnings, “Trump better think twice before he picks a war with Iran.” Yes, speedboats armed with .50 MGs is going to bring us to our knees, you traitorous fucks.

“Top 10 reasons why Iran would lay waste to the American military.” - Vox

3
nachosamplerREBORN 3 points ago +3 / -0

Habitual line steppers need to be slapped every so often.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

"When midgets step up, I stomp midget asses." - Macho Man Randy Savage

3
Tenenmous 3 points ago +4 / -1

Obviously retaliate if attacked, but bring our men home. Why put them in harm's way?

We don't need to be in the middle east. SPEND THE MONEY ON BUILDING A STRONG ARMY AND INFRASTRUCTURE. NO MORE USELESS WARS FOR FOREIGN INTERESTS.

1
TheBlueWhale 1 point ago +1 / -0

Iran has to be put down like the rabid dog it is.

1
Tenenmous 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not by us. It wouldn't benefit us enough to put our best citizens at risk.

I am not in favor of putting our soldiers lives at risk for foreign interests

1
krzyzowiec 1 point ago +1 / -0

It doesn't work that way though. The US guarantees open shipping lanes. If not for us, you would see fights over critical areas where oil or other goods need to travel through.

Look at this map. Say you abandon that area. Now SA and Iran fight over the strait and who gets to control ships leaving the gulf.

It's not like the US is the big bad and if you removed us then everything would be swell. You remove us and then Iran or SA take our place in that area, and then your oil supply is dictated by them. Part of the reason we got involved in the Middle East in the first place is because the leaders in that region used oil supply/prices to hold the Western world hostage.

The very reason we have a Strategic Oil Reserve (which Trump just refilled) is because OPEC decided to stop selling us oil over their dumb Jew hatred. They tried to destroy Israel, and because the US supported the country, they decided to mess with our oil supply in order to put pressure on us. None of this is market driven, it's political.

It would be nice if we could just be friendly and mind our own business, but that is a fantasy. The reason we created the US Navy originally is because African Muslims were harassing our trade ships and enslaving Europeans. Some things never change.

1
Tenenmous 1 point ago +1 / -0

But we are.energy independent now. Why should we forfeit our soldiers lives for foreign interests?

1
krzyzowiec 1 point ago +1 / -0

The energy independence is great for us right now, but it's temporary. I'm not sure what the answer is in the future, but being at the mercy of the Middle East cartels isn't great either. Ideally we'd find some new energy resource to replace oil, and then forget about the sand people.

2
Samjacklol 2 points ago +2 / -0

What are we doing there tho?

2
Viewer01 2 points ago +2 / -0

When you play stupid games you win stupid prizes.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0