160
Comments (11)
sorted by:
10
CIANSAFBIhateUs 10 points ago +10 / -0

The study reads like a college Stats 101 paper. It's so weak it's comical. But, it will get the sheeples crazy and too afraid to realize they are being herded off a cliff. I guess it's one way to thin the herd.

1
Oda_nicullah 1 point ago +1 / -0

Population control.

8
IAbsolutelyDare 8 points ago +8 / -0

The whole "study" is post hoc ergo proper hoc. They didn't measure PCR rates, the indicator of whether the drug works or not. (See the left axis of Raoult's graph here.) They only measured outcomes which could be influenced by dozens of variables.

It's likely (almost certain) that the drug was working perfectly when the patient died of co-morbidities or because they started giving the drug too late.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
4
DarkMemeDuck 4 points ago +5 / -1

Is that the report that followed 300 or so folks with 3 or more underlying conditions on average? Yeah, that wasn't horribly slanted to fail.

3
Cminc 3 points ago +3 / -0

I see no issue in harming people stupid enough to believe that survivors are wrong.

1
MlazedBayhem 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can blatantly see Operation Mockingbird in all these anti Hydroxychloroquine articles. 90% of them say the same headlines “more deaths, no benefit”.

1
GamerPepe 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
fdagasfd 1 point ago +1 / -0

Imagine trusting CNN as a news authority, reading this article, catching China Flu, going to the hospital and having the doctor prescribe you hydroxychloroquine.

CNN will be responsible for people arguing with their doctors over what medicine they are prescribed.

Enemy of the people.

1
Formerlurker92 1 point ago +1 / -0

Woof. The tale is waging the dog