2483
Comments (109)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
Thenew23rd 2 points ago +8 / -6

Et tu, TS?

I'll be the first to admit there are some very strange pics and videos of Michelle. This is not in dispute.

Otoh, there are also many pics of Michelle as a girl growing up in the Robinson household.

I don't know what's up with the pics and videos. But Michelle got her start in life as a girl; that much can be established. Fwiw.

13
Toughsky_Shitsky 13 points ago +15 / -2

I call xher Mike as a meme. I know it's a female ... barely.

But lefties haaaate that we think it's a man, so I have my fun . . . same thing that Joan Rivers did.

4
Chopblock 4 points ago +5 / -1

But, Zero is still a zero, right?

That’s not opinion, that’s a mathematical fact!

3
Thenew23rd 3 points ago +3 / -0

Got it--thanks.

5
Liberty_Prime 5 points ago +5 / -0

Keep it secret...keep it safe 🤐

1
LatitudeofMind 1 point ago +1 / -0

Big mike has a dick sorry folks

8
RiverFenix 8 points ago +9 / -1

What about Lady Gaga?

I don't MEAN to sound crazy, but all this tranny shit has got me wondering more than once whether we've been deceived into accepting certain 'women' as sex idols so that in the future we can get the ultimate flip-flop-mind-fuck when they 'come out' as tranny. Not all, but some, are questionable. The 70s'-80s had a lot of guys in drag (think KISS, AEROSMITH) and we all know there's a gay mafia in Hollywood desperately into girly-boys. It's all just very unsettling when you see a hot chick and question whether you should question their "sex junk" as Bill Nye would say.

3
Thenew23rd 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't follow Gaga much at all. From what I understand the only actual evidence that she's in reality he comes from photoshops. It would take more than that to convince me.

6
1776-or-1984 6 points ago +6 / -0

Have you seen the Joan Rivers clip of a reporter asking her "When do you think we'll have th 1st gay president?"

She goes "We already do. Barack is married to a transgender."

1
Thenew23rd 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yes. Two points. If this were true Joan Rivers and conspiracy sites would not be the only sources. [For example, Obama's fabricated birth certificate. There was an inside whistleblower who said it was common knowledge that Obama had no original HI LFBC. Gov. Abercrombie also confirmed this fact.]

Second, not everything a comedienne says is literal truth. Sometimes they are just being funny/entertaining.

6
1776-or-1984 6 points ago +6 / -0

CIA invited the term "conspiracy theorist" to discredit anyone with both plausible and implausible explanations for things that didn't fit the narrative. They paid the author of James Bond to create an iconic character that made intelligence agents look cool, the good guys. Not a conspiracy guy at all, but I'm against "farfetched" but mildly open to plausible theories. No I don't believe in Q either. I don't know anything about Alex Jones either.

Edit: also I will say I don't frequent conspiracy sites, I've seen too many people that once shown the rabbit hole, go down it and never come back out.

1
Thenew23rd 1 point ago +1 / -0

The CIA appropriated the term but they did not invent it.

The first usage I could find was from 1870, The Journal of mental science: Volume 16 - Page 141

The theory of Dr. Sankey as to the manner in which these injuries to the chest occurred in asylums deserved our careful attention. It was at least more plausible that the conspiracy theory of Mr. Charles Beade, and the precautionary measure suggested by Dr. Sankey of using a padded waistcoat in recent cases of mania with general paralysis—in which mental condition nearly all these cases under discussion were—seemed to him of practical value.

https://www.metabunk.org/threads/debunked-the-cia-invented-the-term-conspiracy-theory-in-1967-with-memo-1035-960.960/

I believe in many theories that are labeled 'conspiracy.' The difference between me and certain other conspiracy theorists is that I do require some evidence. 'Because I can envision in my mind that it could be like that/could have happened that way,' is not evidence.

Re Michelle Obama. The turquoise dress pic is straight up strange. I have a couple of vague ideas about it but nothing definite. All I can say affirmatively is that, 'It can only mean that Michelle is a man,' is not true. That's called "the fallacy of too few options." There are three or four possible explanations, at least.

I saw, and read very carefully, the discussion of two master-class seamstresses re the Ellen DeGeneres video. Both were one hundred percent certain that poor sewing/design of the pants was at fault. Not knowing, myself, a sewing machine from a hole in the ground, I cannot say. But again I note, we have at least two possible explanations.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Thenew23rd 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hawaiian Long Form Birth Certificate

1
Thearchduke 1 point ago +1 / -0

Something about HI (Hawaii) L..(dunno).F...(dunno) Birth Certificate.

3
Oda_nicullah 3 points ago +3 / -0

Normally girls don’t turn into linebackers and then back into girls.

Can you supply sources?

3
Thenew23rd 3 points ago +4 / -1

My primary source is logic. The Robinson family was/is well known in Chicago. Michelle is one of their children, born and raised in their family. It was not the custom, in 1964, for a black family to have a boy baby but raise it as a girl. As various childhood photos of Michelle indicate, she was raised as a girl.

People apparantly imagine that Michelle was known to no one as she was growing up. So that somehow she either could have been a biological male raised as a girl or else a nonentity for whom a male was substituted at a given point in time. That's not how it happens irl. Michelle attended public school and was a known entity. Gossip that she is a man didn't start until the pic of the turquoise dress. Neither you nor anyone else can find questions re her sex that predate the turquoise dress photo.

2
Thearchduke 2 points ago +2 / -0

"It was not the custom..." ??? It STILL isn't.

1
Oda_nicullah 1 point ago +1 / -0

Crazy.

Normally when women are pregnant (especially more than once) They have pictures of themselves pregnant. There’s not one.

1
Thenew23rd 1 point ago +1 / -0

That argument actually works against you. How hard would it have been for Michelle to stuff a pillow under her dress [they manufacture pregnancy pouches also], have a couple of pics taken and post them online.

That's what would have happened if Obama had married a man but planned to pass off a couple of adopted children as their own. They would have taken the tiny amount of effort required to make sure that not only were there pregnancy pics, but that those pics were posted online.

1
Thearchduke 1 point ago +1 / -0

Think...Chastity Bono...