2483
Comments (109)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
Thenew23rd 3 points ago +4 / -1

My primary source is logic. The Robinson family was/is well known in Chicago. Michelle is one of their children, born and raised in their family. It was not the custom, in 1964, for a black family to have a boy baby but raise it as a girl. As various childhood photos of Michelle indicate, she was raised as a girl.

People apparantly imagine that Michelle was known to no one as she was growing up. So that somehow she either could have been a biological male raised as a girl or else a nonentity for whom a male was substituted at a given point in time. That's not how it happens irl. Michelle attended public school and was a known entity. Gossip that she is a man didn't start until the pic of the turquoise dress. Neither you nor anyone else can find questions re her sex that predate the turquoise dress photo.

2
Thearchduke 2 points ago +2 / -0

"It was not the custom..." ??? It STILL isn't.

1
Oda_nicullah 1 point ago +1 / -0

Crazy.

Normally when women are pregnant (especially more than once) They have pictures of themselves pregnant. There’s not one.

1
Thenew23rd 1 point ago +1 / -0

That argument actually works against you. How hard would it have been for Michelle to stuff a pillow under her dress [they manufacture pregnancy pouches also], have a couple of pics taken and post them online.

That's what would have happened if Obama had married a man but planned to pass off a couple of adopted children as their own. They would have taken the tiny amount of effort required to make sure that not only were there pregnancy pics, but that those pics were posted online.