Please please keep this in talks. Do not let the media suppress it. They are successfully doing so. We have the cure. We don't need a chipped vaccine. We can open everywhere within the month if we actually start using this stuff large scale.
It IS a win situation! We're one of the only Countries not using it widely, and it shows. Give Trump pills to people when they're first diagnosed positive and the death rate drops by 97.4% as compared to the US average.
The only thing not winning is those who test positive and are denied medicine until they're in such bad shape that they need to be admitted to the hospital. Everyone like that that dies is a preventable death, and their Governor interfering with the practice is guilty of their murder.
That's not winning, especially if we allow the practice to continue and stand by doing nothing as it happens.
They literally will let people die to make Orange man be wrong. He brought it up, and got the word out, and he's not pushing harder to give them more fuel. Now he's letting them hang themselves going against it, like they always do.
The whole "study" is post hoc ergo proper hoc. They didn't measure PCR rates, the key indicator of whether the drug works or not. (See the left axis of Raoult's graph here.) They only measured outcomes which could be influenced by dozens of variables.
It's likely (almost certain) that the drug was working perfectly when the patient died of co-morbidities or because they started giving the drug too late.
Don't they need to take the z-packs with it to attack the pneumonia causing bacteria that inflames the lungs? Everything I've seen or read says it's a three-prong attack. HCQ, z-packs and zinc.
Trump pills are the combination of all three, yes. This study was designed to make HCQ fail, and should have no bearing on anything since "right to try" law was passed.
To say pneumonia in this disease is a result of bacterial infection is incorrect. Many other things from the virus wreak havoc with human lungs, no bacteria needed. We don't really know why azithromycin helps, it's just a guess that all it does is attacks a secondary bacterial infection that's being opportunistic in a person that's severely sick. It might do other things too, nobody knows. HCQ might do things other than being a zinc ionophore too, nobody knows. It has long been known that HCQ has some antiviral properties; they've been hiding that fact.
Nobody knows why HCQ works with lupus or rheumatoid arthritis either, but it does. And nobody interferes with Drs prescribing it.
I'm not sure the z-packs are for bacteria, as most modern bacteria are resistant to z-packs. I think z-packs are another ionophore but I have to check, there might be a second mechanism going on.
Also you want to give the HCQ+Zinc early in the phase of pneumonia, or else it's too late and too much damage done.
The hypothesis should be refined as "if you test positive for antibodies using the 5-minute test, go on a 1-week regimen of HCQ+Zinc. It should reduce the chance of pneumonia". An entire study on that should take less than 1 month.
Note that most of the bad side effects of HCQ are for the months it takes to attack malaria parasites, not one week.
Yup, It was set up to show the worst results and most people with a brain know why. Big Pharma has deep pockets and will go to great lengths to fatten their wallets even if it kills people.
One of the authors has also taken money from Gilead. Gilead is trying to push their $1,000 Remdesivir drug as a treatment for China virus. HCQ is a threat to them making tons of money off of this.
They found a new drug called "remetiv" or some satanist name, it has been through "observations" and looks "promising" per mainstream media. It has just as much evidence to work as hydroxychlorquine. Essentially all they have done is give it to people and see that it works sometimes. Whats the difference between hydroxychlorquine and remetiv?
I think the one you're referring to is called "remdesivir". Made by the same company (Gilead Sciences) that put out the AZT treatment for HIV/AIDS with all kinds of terrible side effects.
Big Pharma is pushing remdesivir because it's really expensive ($1000/dose or for the course of treatment? Not sure on that one.)
The HCQ treatment is cheap and effective. That's why they're suppressing the Good News and highlighting this latest Phony Study.
We (and GEOTUS) need to stop giving ol' Nipsy so much attention. There's no such thing as bad press, and the more his name comes up the more people think about him.
It's just plain sad seeing so many people religiously bash this drug purely because President Trump said good things about it, but will treat Bill Gates as an overlord who is super qualified to be speaking about the stuff he blows out his ass
Oh, sure. One study has bad results and NOW they want to talk about it. Let's pretend there haven't been twenty other (larger) studies with excellent results.
Please please keep this in talks. Do not let the media suppress it. They are successfully doing so. We have the cure. We don't need a chipped vaccine. We can open everywhere within the month if we actually start using this stuff large scale.
We could be open now if we'd started large scale use sooner. Like, I dunno, WHEN TRUMP SAID TO.
Serious question, why did he stop talking about it?
I've been wondering that myself. Could have realized it was a no win situation.
It IS a win situation! We're one of the only Countries not using it widely, and it shows. Give Trump pills to people when they're first diagnosed positive and the death rate drops by 97.4% as compared to the US average.
The only thing not winning is those who test positive and are denied medicine until they're in such bad shape that they need to be admitted to the hospital. Everyone like that that dies is a preventable death, and their Governor interfering with the practice is guilty of their murder.
That's not winning, especially if we allow the practice to continue and stand by doing nothing as it happens.
They literally will let people die to make Orange man be wrong. He brought it up, and got the word out, and he's not pushing harder to give them more fuel. Now he's letting them hang themselves going against it, like they always do.
already happened. Oklahoma made it available straight away.
https://apnews.com/a5077c7227b8eb8b0dc23423c0bbe2b2
ABOUT THE STUDY MSM IS USING TO SAY THIS DOES NOT WORK...
1 - Not randomized. MD's selected patients based on severity
2 - HCQ late in disease vs early when antivirals provide most benefit
3 - No zinc
The whole "study" is post hoc ergo proper hoc. They didn't measure PCR rates, the key indicator of whether the drug works or not. (See the left axis of Raoult's graph here.) They only measured outcomes which could be influenced by dozens of variables.
It's likely (almost certain) that the drug was working perfectly when the patient died of co-morbidities or because they started giving the drug too late.
The left wants us dead.
That was the first thing I checked when I read the stupid paper
Stupid asinine "one variable at a time" researchers.
The hypothesis is: An ionophore (like HCQ) helps zinc ions pass into cells reducing viral replication.
TEST THE DAMNED HYPOTHESIS NOT A SINGLE CHEMICAL
This! Its the damn zinc that does the work. Just softening the cells without it is pointless.
Don't they need to take the z-packs with it to attack the pneumonia causing bacteria that inflames the lungs? Everything I've seen or read says it's a three-prong attack. HCQ, z-packs and zinc.
Trump pills are the combination of all three, yes. This study was designed to make HCQ fail, and should have no bearing on anything since "right to try" law was passed.
To say pneumonia in this disease is a result of bacterial infection is incorrect. Many other things from the virus wreak havoc with human lungs, no bacteria needed. We don't really know why azithromycin helps, it's just a guess that all it does is attacks a secondary bacterial infection that's being opportunistic in a person that's severely sick. It might do other things too, nobody knows. HCQ might do things other than being a zinc ionophore too, nobody knows. It has long been known that HCQ has some antiviral properties; they've been hiding that fact.
Nobody knows why HCQ works with lupus or rheumatoid arthritis either, but it does. And nobody interferes with Drs prescribing it.
I'm not sure the z-packs are for bacteria, as most modern bacteria are resistant to z-packs. I think z-packs are another ionophore but I have to check, there might be a second mechanism going on.
Also you want to give the HCQ+Zinc early in the phase of pneumonia, or else it's too late and too much damage done.
The hypothesis should be refined as "if you test positive for antibodies using the 5-minute test, go on a 1-week regimen of HCQ+Zinc. It should reduce the chance of pneumonia". An entire study on that should take less than 1 month.
Note that most of the bad side effects of HCQ are for the months it takes to attack malaria parasites, not one week.
Yup, It was set up to show the worst results and most people with a brain know why. Big Pharma has deep pockets and will go to great lengths to fatten their wallets even if it kills people.
One of the authors has also taken money from Gilead. Gilead is trying to push their $1,000 Remdesivir drug as a treatment for China virus. HCQ is a threat to them making tons of money off of this.
THIS. THIS. THIS.
The "study" is pure propaganda that was designed to fail.
Ohhhhh, so these fuckers want MORE of the shit they swear doesn't work?!!!! Isn't that a kick in the balls?? NO!!!!
But the media got their headline.
Cuomo's probably trying to control the supply of HCQ just like he did with ventilators.
“Please sir, I want some more.”
GOD damm fucking COMMIE
Why can't he get infected and then forced to take HCQ and thank Trump for saving his life?
She talks over him when he mentions the fact that Cuomo is in the oval office asking for more. She never asks him to elaborate. Piece of shit.
...so anecdotal evidence is OK now if it proves orange man wrong?
Fuck me. The shit show over this fucking drug combo is a fucking joke.
It's like having a cure for cancer and people just refusing to give it to people. Because of reasons.
It's so insane.
Let the leftists go without the drugs that are given out like candy in Africa. Enjoy.
Get fucked NIH
They found a new drug called "remetiv" or some satanist name, it has been through "observations" and looks "promising" per mainstream media. It has just as much evidence to work as hydroxychlorquine. Essentially all they have done is give it to people and see that it works sometimes. Whats the difference between hydroxychlorquine and remetiv?
Commercials on tv and patents.
I think the one you're referring to is called "remdesivir". Made by the same company (Gilead Sciences) that put out the AZT treatment for HIV/AIDS with all kinds of terrible side effects.
Big Pharma is pushing remdesivir because it's really expensive ($1000/dose or for the course of treatment? Not sure on that one.)
The HCQ treatment is cheap and effective. That's why they're suppressing the Good News and highlighting this latest Phony Study.
Yes, and i think remdesivir could be an appropriate treatment late-stage, which HQC isn't.
Yeah and Gilead Sciences is like one of the largest companies in the world in the bio/health sector
Yup, follow the (Big Pharma) money!!
People will pay them to say it on TV because those people will make money off of it's sale.
But, but, but, hydroxychloroquine bad per Cuomo and his minions.
Remember, NPC, HCQ BAD, Remdesivir GOOD !
We (and GEOTUS) need to stop giving ol' Nipsy so much attention. There's no such thing as bad press, and the more his name comes up the more people think about him.
In b4 Cuomo is no longer allowed to make public comments by the media because he's "spreading misinformation"
It's just plain sad seeing so many people religiously bash this drug purely because President Trump said good things about it, but will treat Bill Gates as an overlord who is super qualified to be speaking about the stuff he blows out his ass
Nobody tell Cuomo you have to take it with zinc or it won't work
Oh, sure. One study has bad results and NOW they want to talk about it. Let's pretend there haven't been twenty other (larger) studies with excellent results.
This "study" was DESIGNED to have bad results!