767 U.S. judge dismisses actor Jussie Smollett's lawsuit alleging malicious prosecution (www.reuters.com) posted 359 days ago by Yippy 359 days ago by Yippy +767 / -0 30 comments share 30 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (30) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ -3 ▼ – MinuteGrass -3 points 359 days ago +2 / -5 That's 100% Democrat owned judges for you. permalink save report block reply ▲ 15 ▼ – marsajane1949 15 points 359 days ago +15 / -0 What are you talking about? They dismissed his lawsuit trying to sue the city. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 14 ▼ – Squidproblow 14 points 359 days ago +14 / -0 Yeah ya misread this my dude. This is good. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 8 ▼ – vinnychase 8 points 359 days ago +9 / -1 Don't just read the title man we have to be better than the idiots on reddit permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 7 ▼ – Squidproblow 7 points 359 days ago +7 / -0 What part of this article upsets you? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – vinnychase 1 point 359 days ago +4 / -3 No part? I was talking about the fact that you read the title and made an assumption before actually reading the article. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – MinuteGrass 1 point 358 days ago +1 / -0 Yeah, well I was tired, Juicy's Mullet doesn't entirely interest me anymore (unless they tie him to Booker and Harris and their anti-lynching bill and arrest those motherfuckers), and was just lazy. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – MinuteGrass 2 points 359 days ago +2 / -0 I see that now :) permalink parent save report block reply
That's 100% Democrat owned judges for you.
What are you talking about? They dismissed his lawsuit trying to sue the city.
Yeah ya misread this my dude. This is good.
Don't just read the title man we have to be better than the idiots on reddit
What part of this article upsets you?
No part? I was talking about the fact that you read the title and made an assumption before actually reading the article.
Yeah, well I was tired, Juicy's Mullet doesn't entirely interest me anymore (unless they tie him to Booker and Harris and their anti-lynching bill and arrest those motherfuckers), and was just lazy.
I see that now :)