2253
Comments (149)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
15
RussianBot2 15 points ago +16 / -1

Ok. Someone please do the Math, what is the death rate now? < 0.0001%?

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
1
WalterEKurtz 1 point ago +1 / -0

yes, but the homeless are outside allot. like in the sun. so their lifestyle has built in immunity to the wuflu the various kungflu.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
12
Oskar 12 points ago +12 / -0

It's looking like between 1/3 to 2/3 of us have had it.

Pretty soon there's going to be a "problem" with the antibody test so we can't all take it and realize we locked down for a shitty cold

6
VinnysMagicGrits 6 points ago +6 / -0

I always thought COVID-19 was here before the first reported case back in January. This is nothing more than an easy to catch flu type illness but the thing is not every reacts to certain strands of the flu. This was over hyped to the max and it just so happens to be election year.

1
stormybanks 1 point ago +1 / -0

It almost certainly was. The first case detected in China was back in November. China didn't shut down anything until late January. Coronavirus had probably already gone around the world undetected by then.

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
1
HockeyMom4Trump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. Our pediatrician office isn’t even allowed to test children

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
HockeyMom4Trump 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree. I was just saying the number of cases is probably much higher and the mortality rate much lower, as they aren't even testing children/teens

3
DrBJTester 3 points ago +3 / -0

In New York State 0.0433% +/- with current data. Half a percent.

1
RussianBot2 1 point ago +2 / -1

half percent of a percent

-1
deleted -1 points ago +7 / -8
6
RussianBot2 6 points ago +7 / -1

2.5 times worse, so like a bad flu, right? I agree.

4
Slick_Willy 4 points ago +4 / -0

Twice as bad as a normal flu is NOT bad.

You don't shut down the world for that.

Fucking hell

3
ColbyP 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lmao. No. It's really, really not.

2
DarkestMatt 2 points ago +3 / -1

I think when we factor in that hospitals have been labelling any death a vivid death it’s gonna appear to be more like 0.3.