1951
Comments (75)
sorted by:
40
HockeyMom4Trump 40 points ago +40 / -0

The other 4 are fraudsters

33
snuggs316 33 points ago +33 / -0

the other 4 are democrats. ftfy.

11
NoatakTheWiser 11 points ago +11 / -0

There's a difference?

6
Criss_P_Bacon 6 points ago +6 / -0

Spoiler: they’re the same.

8
outsideop 8 points ago +8 / -0

The other 4 are completely ignorant. It’s a small stat but it’s not encouraging at all. At least 60% is a majority. And if we can extrapolate it to Trump getting a 60% majority vote in November, then hot damn.

6
AenAllAin 6 points ago +6 / -0

The other 4 answers were mailed in.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
25
ripturntle 25 points ago +25 / -0

It simply will not be allowed to happen. It would be civil war..

21
WinstonSmith1984 21 points ago +21 / -0

Concur. It will take a while, but I will never accept the results of a 100% mail in national election

10
Rugar22 10 points ago +10 / -0

Same, I want all early forms of voting to be completely outlawed.

6
WinstonSmith1984 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes. Every step away from "vote today in person" is a step that degrades the integrity of the elections.

Beyond basic fraud, early voting adds a whole different mess. What if one guy dies or is rendered incapacitated. Do I get to vote again, since it isn't election day yet?

3
gabwinone 3 points ago +3 / -0

Show up at the polls. Show your voter ID. Get a paper ballot. Fill it out. Turn it in to precinct workers of BOTH parties who keep a keen eye on the other guy.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
1
WinstonSmith1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, I can't get on board with the blood thing; I'd prefer not to give them my DNA!

The biggest problem is that they are trying to expand the fraud nationwide, and in so doing kill the electoral college and federalism in general.

We KNOW the cities are shitholes without fair elections, rife with unfair practices and manufactured votes. We know the far-left blue states are rife with fraud. So far, we have still had a "chance" to elect more conservative leaders.

If the midwest and south, and those patriots in blue states who depend on them to put some sanity at the top, fully perceive that their votes don't matter because of the fraud in the far left states (either becasue of the end of the electoral college, or the fact it will not matter if mail-in and ballot harvesting become the norm in PA, MI, WI, and NC, or god-forbid the illegals vote in TX) then the Republic will cease to exist in name as well as in fact.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
DiscerningSword 2 points ago +2 / -0

I used to think that. Then I had a vision and now I see it more like a seound American revolution against the Powers which are at War with God...Globalist, Communust Chinese and every other Demon spawned faction its a basically a cohilition of the Godless..

Not many of them are down for sacrificing themselves for the "cause". They are fine with killing people as long as they dont fight back. Fighting back then is what we will do....

2
Caferrell 2 points ago +2 / -0

It will happen and there will be no civil war. I wish I had your faith in the resolve of descent people when they are put into a situation where the hierarchy of a nation violates their own laws.

I am afraid that good people will make some noise and then collapse as soon as the permanent state sends out their goons. Remember that the Democrats are clever. They have the CIA and the FBI on their side. Would the Army and the Marines confront Federal law enforcement?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
23
WinstonSmith1984 23 points ago +23 / -0

Poll: More than 4 in 10 Americans are retards.

13
usernamenottaken 13 points ago +13 / -0

4 in 10 are brainwashed. I would posit that most of the intellectually challenged would love Trump. I bet if GEOTUS did something to honor Special Olympics, the media antics would be most entertaining.

6
WinstonSmith1984 6 points ago +6 / -0

kek:) He should hand out little ribbons at the press beatings!

4
usernamenottaken 4 points ago +4 / -0

Better yet, he could have a 'special' press volunteer to hand out a ribbon after each dumb question and exclaim, "Congratulations!" While an off camera aide rings a cowbell.

3
WinstonSmith1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes! And on Tuesdays, we can get Jeff Foxworthy in to hand out signs, too:)

3
splink 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is great, if we work on it maybe we can make them jump through hoops and wrestle in mud for little journalism award plaques. They may as well at least entertain us.

2
ChuckedBeef 2 points ago +2 / -0

4 in 10 want free shit till the wheels fall off.

2
Caferrell 2 points ago +2 / -0

Poll: More than 4 in 10 Americans are Democrats

1
WinstonSmith1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

or at least feel like them!

2
Long_time_lurker 2 points ago +2 / -0

They're not dumb, they just hope to benefit from it.

1
WinstonSmith1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think hoping to benefit from voter fraud (and the associated fall of our Republic) might be indicative of some lack of intellectual development.

14
linereddit 14 points ago +14 / -0

The other four are illegal aliens, fake identities, duplicate respondents, or dead.

4
cjcivicx 4 points ago +4 / -0

Bingo.

4
Brlove0915 4 points ago +4 / -0

Your comment was at zero. We have our own site, but loser redditors are still brigading us.

1
cjcivicx 1 point ago +2 / -1

I have quite the following, as my Reddit account is the same as this one. Funny enough, fake internet points and people's opinion of me online mean exactly nothing in the real world.

3
Brlove0915 3 points ago +3 / -0

They downvoted this one too! What the hell? Shills go home!

2
xzibit_b 2 points ago +3 / -1

Same here.

10
Kek_Johnson 10 points ago +10 / -0

Election night: Republicans have clearly won.

Day after the election: Dems are suddenly getting a landslide amount of incoming votes. The dead, illegals and duplicate votes are people too.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1
6
WinstonSmith1984 6 points ago +6 / -0

If it's allowed then that's the end of the Republic. It was a good run.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
7
SAW2TH 7 points ago +7 / -0

The 6 republicans fear fraud.

The 4 democrats think it is fine.

Democrats sweep the election because of mail in ballots, ballot harvesting and absentee ballots - even though they were only 40% of the population.

🤷🏼‍♂️

7
bigtimepie 7 points ago +7 / -0

This goes to show that without voter fraud Republicans would always get 60% of the votes.

6
remember1776 6 points ago +6 / -0

I dont see what the problem is. If we’re standing in line at Costco six feet apart while practicing social distancing in store, why can’t we do all that at the polling station? That is, if we even have to do this social distancing shit in November still.

5
Tryhardneckbeard 5 points ago +5 / -0

So 90%?

4
remember1776 4 points ago +4 / -0

if a majority of illegals didn't vote because of the exposure risk of in-person voting at polling places, imagine the deluge of illegal votes if that risk were taken away by mail-in voting. it would be a fuckin tsunami.

4
Rodger 4 points ago +4 / -0

If the Republicans allow mail-in voting to happen, the Republican party will Cease to exist. The Democrats will do anything to win the presidency, the Senate and the house. So why would any Republican agree to mail-in voting. What the Republicans should be doing is Demanding voter ID SO Russia and China and whoever else is guilty don't interfere in our elections. The problem is Too many of the Republicans are Pansies and scared to voice their approval for voter ID probably because they know the Democrats will just use their old standby term of (Racist) (Racist) (Racist). IF the Democrats talk for ONE second that they could not control the votes with mail-in voting they would refuse to allow mail-in voting. Come on people it's not that hard. You have to have an ID to buy a beer, you have to have an ID to fly on an airplane, you have to have an ID to get into the courthouse, you have to have an ID to drive a car, you have to have an ID to buy a house, you have to have an ID to buy a car, yet somehow having an ID to vote is racist? really? Republicans spend too much time trying to make the Democrats like them. The truth of the matter is the Democrats for the most part hate Republicans they are on two separate sides of the equation. in my heart I believe 100% that President Trump Will win in a landslide in November his re-election for president. Furthermore in November the Republicans can have a majority in both the senate in the house IF the Republicans will grow a backbone and do what's right..

3
AenAllAin 3 points ago +3 / -0

The other 4 answers were mailed in.

3
Trumpdup4prez 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’m not worried it will, I know it will.

Once that shit was passed in NJ, Dems flipped 15 out of 16 towns in my county from Republican run to Dem run. 15 out of 16.

3
PraiseBeToScience 3 points ago +3 / -0

Mail-in-voting has its place and its place is "sparingly". The military has to use mail-in-voting, as do people overseas.

But widespread mail-in-voting means there is no chain of custody and you could discard tens of thousands of ballots simply by originating zip code, and you could also fill out ballots for anyone else. I guarantee you I would get mail-in-voting ballots from the previous tenants who lived in my house, seeing as how I still get literally all their mail otherwise. Nothing stops me from opening up a ballot, filling it out, and mailing it in.

2
ohpleaseuhhelpame 2 points ago +2 / -0

Should be more like 8 in10 at minimum but I'll take the 6 if it gives us the win!

2
Znut55 2 points ago +2 / -0

And those that aren't worried are clearly DEMS who have no problem winning by any means possible.

2
TheironToaster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Did you know that 1 out 3 democrats are stupider than the other two?

2
stratocaster_patriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

If it's a spike they are asking about that means at least 6 in 10 believe there is fraud to begin with. Possibly a few of the other 4 do too but just don't think it will spike. But 6 in 10 believe there is fraud.

2
Jcholl9 2 points ago +2 / -0

Mail-in Voting is a Democrat wet dream...

2
OhLollyLollyPop 2 points ago +2 / -0

Of all people, Teump will never sign a bill that includes this. Pelosi knows it. This is just leftist jibberish. Also, without vote harvesting, most people won't bother returning their ballots.

2
Brlove0915 2 points ago +2 / -0

The other 4 surveyed had been dead for 20yrs, but voted Dem in last three elections.

1
DiscerningSword 1 point ago +1 / -0

If this is how it begins so be it. Prepare, they have to show us what they are doing its part of their spells inversion, rebelllion against God stuff.

1
EvanGRogers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only?

1
fazaman 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not worried that mail-in voting might increase fraud at all. I fully expect it to happen.

1
Mentos25 1 point ago +1 / -0

What are the ways to tell mail in voter fraud is happening? We in Oregon have had mail in voting for years and it seems ok. It does raise voter turnout, but I havent thought of fraud. Not saying fraud can't happen, but I'm not as pessimistic as others are. I do have an open mind about potential areas of fraud and would love to look into Oregon's systems for red flags.

3
STEVE_HUFFMANS_BULL 3 points ago +3 / -0

What are the ways to tell mail in voter fraud is happening?

I object to the form of the argument. When examining the security of any system, the correct question to ask is instead “how could someone defraud this system, and what measures are we taking to prevent such actions?” If we can’t prove mail-in voting is secure, we have to assume it’s not, that there’s a security hole that somebody could exploit, and that they probably are using it for malicious purposes

1
Mentos25 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oregon has been using it for awhile. Let me reframe my question; how can we prove its secure? We have a primary in a few weeks, that would be a great place to review data.

1
STEVE_HUFFMANS_BULL 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did you even read my comment? My point is that you can’t prove anything is secure, the closest you can get is “we do not know of any vulnerabilities that could lead to a malicious actor gaining unauthorized access.”

I work in tech. We have the understanding there that you Do Not Trust Any User Input to be safe or correct. You always validate that it is formatted correctly before using it in server functions. Same thing goes for voting. Regardless of what scheme is used, assume the Side of Beef is working in every step of the process. How does your scheme prevent her from fucking with the numbers?

3
123breadman 3 points ago +4 / -1

Because liberals claim that voter ID is racist and people like me are too stupid to figure out how to get an ID.

But at the same time vote by mail requires ID, but democrats oppose the 1st choice where humans can be verified, but still use the same argument over and over again.

1
christianknight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only? This country is full of idiots.

1
OhLollyLollyPop 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are right to worry about it. Just go out and vote in person.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
biorito 1 point ago +1 / -0

The other 8-in-10 think it'll be just fine!

1
ippwndu 1 point ago +1 / -0

What if Trump says, “I’ll see your mail-in voting and raise you online, blockchain voting.”?

1
splink 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oregonpedes know it WILL.

1
BasedCostanza91 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hate to say it but Dem Govs and Dem Mayors will drag this out until November so they can force mail-in ballots.

1
RunningBuffalo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even assuming zero cheating (which, come on, there's a lot of cheating) mail-in ballots are not secret ballots! Your boss, your union rep, your spouse, your parents can demand to see who you voted for. The whole idea is anti-democratic

0
AlohaSnackbar 0 points ago +1 / -1

I got bored, and came up with what I THINK would put this to bed.

All mail in votes have to have a fingerprint , a photocopy of state issued ID, 1 utility bill matching name and address, and a phone number they can be reached at during the week preceding the election.

All prints, names, addresses are entered into a database, any fingerprint duplicates and any non matches (think excons/government workers/illegals detained at least once already in system) go into a "don't get counted/Definitely get arrested pile".

All clean ones then go into a "hold". They are called by machine at the number they provided and asked a small series of yes/no (1 or 9) questions. Is "x" they "y" number of your social security number? Is "x" the third letter of your last name? Etc. No phone number can be associated with more than 3 votes. Anyone not home will be re-called by the machine. Anyone failing the test will have their ballot separated and investigated.

All those that pass will be opened and counted.

Of course, all of us pedes, and anyone justifiably concerned with providing the government a fingerprint, can just go to the FUCKING POLLS on election day and provide a goddamn I.D.

Shit, I figure this would COST the Dems at least a few million votes. No more ex-con/illegal/government (post office) employees mass filling out ballots. No more harvesting, mandatory voter ID, and our favorite President gets to offer a national mail in vote initiative.

We get voter ID, they choke on their own bullshit. Win/Win.

1
OhLollyLollyPop 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am not putting my fingerprint or any other personal information on a ballot, that is then looked at by who knows who. Talk about an insecure identification ripoff opportunity.

I can vote by mail due to age, but I think I might just mosey on down to our polling place for early voting this time. The new voting machines suck, but so did the old ones.

0
AlohaSnackbar 0 points ago +1 / -1

I am not putting my fingerprint or any other personal information on a ballot

Nor, in my plan, would you have to.