I mean, while I'm pro-2A, I also have the common sense to realize there needs to be limitations at some point. For example, owning biological, chemical, or nuclear weapons. There's too many fucking crazy people in the world to trust individual random citizens with weapons that could kill thousands of people in an instant.
As with everything, there's a rational middle ground that could be reached if the extremes on both ends would stop being so retarded (the "outlaw everything bigger than a slingshot and maybe even those too" people and the ultra-libertarian "literally every form of weapon in existence should be available to everyone" people).
I mean, while I'm pro-2A, I also have the common sense to realize there needs to be limitations at some point. For example, owning biological, chemical, or nuclear weapons. There's too many fucking crazy people in the world to trust individual random citizens with weapons that could kill thousands of people in an instant.
As with everything, there's a rational middle ground that could be reached if the extremes on both ends would stop being so retarded (the "outlaw everything bigger than a slingshot and maybe even those too" people and the ultra-libertarian "literally every form of weapon in existence should be available to everyone" people).
But couldn't you kill thousands of people in an instant with 22. if you had them all tied to posts and shot at the same time?
Shit, we better ban 22.! It's a weapon of mass destruction!
Go concern troll somewhere else.