2537
Comments (144)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-7
justafellaaskingQs -7 points ago +2 / -9

is it bullshit?

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
0
justafellaaskingQs 0 points ago +1 / -1

Can you give me a reason why? Im just skeptical

2
Major_Nutt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is the climate changing? Yes, planets go through natural cycles of warming and cooling. As it so happens, we're in a warming period because only 10k years ago we were in an ice age, and are still climbing out of it.

Now to boogeyman, is man-made climate change real? No. That's all communist bullshit meant to bring about their new world order, and people are stupid enough to buy into it because doing any research yourself takes too much effort.

-1
justafellaaskingQs -1 points ago +1 / -2

Do you think the C02 the world (and now mostly china) is emitting into the air has had any sort of accelerating affect on this cycle though?

2
koyima 2 points ago +2 / -0

The world is greener, getting out of an ice age , as we still are means our temp would increase

Burning more fossil fuels, means more co2, means more trees , means more oxygen

What do you think fossil fuels are? Carbon that was once in living beings is now released and made into living beings, by feeding plants that we and our animals eat

The sun is the main driver of climate , the models these people use don't take the sun into account nor even cloud coverage. If you think that isn't important sit under the shade of a cloud and then not.

Now also figure out that where you live the temperature fluctuates by maybe even dozens of degrees Celsius between day and night and no tsunamis appear because of that. This happens daily

Now do you know that half the data they use is just created , they literally ignore a quarter of the stations and adjust another quarter based on a theory that doesn't even match the data they claim it's based on

Read the climate gate emails, they literally bully and blacklist people in order to remove papers that go contrary to the narrative from major science publications

Then when they do meta studies to claim that 97% of scientists agree, they have removed thousands of papers that actually have no evidence of such a claim and then lump all the remaining ones they claim agw is a possible reason in the confirmed and agree it is pile...

The science is based on junk data, that is then fed into basically a graph, data that they can't use is deleted or replaced and when they lose lawsuits the media me we covers it

-1
justafellaaskingQs -1 points ago +1 / -2

I don't think i'm reading this right. More C02 wouldn't make more trees. Just like oxygen doesn't make more people. Especially over such a short time-span.

Secondly, carbon isn't inherently negative, of course. Its the oxygen bonds that form the problem because of how it stops radiation (heat) from escaping the atmosphere. The heat from the sun is the "Warming" part of climate change. As C02 increases, our ability to radiate excess heat (regardless of cloud cover, as it happens above the clouds) decreases.

Temperature fluctuations across the earth and global temperatures aren't the same, because heat radiates over a period of time through the air. Its why it takes a radiator a couple minutes to heat a room.

In regards to the climate science, i'm sure there's a ton of contrary data that probably is being held away. But it doesn't change the fundamentals i listed above right?

Unless you don't think C02 increases the earths temperature, but you just said that were coming out of an ice age, which are caused by the carbon cycle.

Im just trying to understand your POV.

1
Major_Nutt 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. Thats the bullshit part. A single volcanic eruption does way more "damage" than human created "greenhouse gases" do. And that "damage" isn't even so because CO2 is fantastic for the environment.

Higher CO2 means bigger plants, bigger plants create more oxygen and more food, more oxygen and more food means bigger and healthier animals.

High "greenhouse gases" are the way we evolve dinosaurs back into existence. Who DOESN'T want that.