2228
Comments (287)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
14
ClownTamer 14 points ago +17 / -3

I’d settle for now for blocking it from happening in swing states. It’s not like CA and NY weren’t going blue anyway.

17
UpTrump 17 points ago +17 / -0

True, but I don't see why all the blue states won't follow. And if a blue governor decides to do mail voting, the state WILL go blue

10
buco 10 points ago +10 / -0

Two weeks ago they talked about it. Now they are doing it. Many purple states out there. Virginia, Michigan, Pennsylvania? Which one is next?

8
Paperbagpatriot 8 points ago +8 / -0

I call PA because they have already had fraud in the number of corona virus death statistics!

6
TheThreeSeashells 6 points ago +6 / -0

Which state with a Democrat governor hasn't been generating fraudulent numbers?

5
Sumarongi 5 points ago +5 / -0

If not for shenanigans they might be red

5
rooftoptendie 5 points ago +6 / -1

IF NOT FOR SHENNANIGANS THE WHOLE DAMN COUNTRY WOULD BE RED. You think Cali and Oregon would be blue and the entire southwest would be purple without shennanigans? The only places I can even imagine going blue with no shennanigans to assist are HI and NY.

3
TheThreeSeashells 3 points ago +3 / -0

The only places I can even imagine going blue with no shennanigans to assist are HI and NY.

I'm not sure about NY. Three million people on Long Island and plenty of illegals. In NY, all you need in order to vote is know the name and address of a registered voter. Show up early enough in the morning and you claim to be that person, sign in, vote and you're done. Rinse and repeat all day long. No ID required. Elections would be a lot different in NY if the voting was on the level.