The thing about YouTube's community guidelines is that they're a complete mystery. They'll remove a video for violating them, but they won't tell you what specific rule the content violates. Steven Crowder protested outside YouTube's corporate HQ after having his entire channel demonetized without being told what he did wrong. How can you expect people to follow your rules if you won't tell them what the rules even are? In reality they keep it secret like that so they can remove anything that doesn't align with their political agenda.
How can you expect people to follow your rules if you won't tell them what the rules even are?
It's Kafkaesque. That's for sure.
Regarding the community guidelines, Youtube has already stated that that when it comes to coronavirus information, their community guidelines align with the official WHO guidelines.
The rules are set up so that Keyboard Karens and Bugmen on the DNC/ShariaBlue payroll can censor content that challenges their narratives by mass reporting violations of the nebulous terms. This way YouTube/Twitter can continue to claim not to be publishers because the decision to censor is not being made by them but by the platform community.
Looks like @BioscienceAytu has had their account suspended on Twitter.
I reported it for inciting hate by promoting an approach by nazi president trump. I also said it triggered my PTSD from my youth when I use to get sunburn easily when playing outside all day.
Here's the thing. I actually believe that Trump did not know about this company or this technology.
But asking questions does not make him dumb. Quite the opposite. Asking questions, even questions that might initially sound crazy, is exactly what a leader is supposed to do. The people who are laughing at him for asking a question lack imagination. (And let's be real clear here, he asked a question - he didn't make a statement.) You make progress by asking questions.
These same people would have laughed at JFK for wanting to go to the moon. These leftists are "progressive" in name only, because they are not at all interested in progressing the human race forward.
He was repeating things he heard, that made him think. about UV, about Vaproizing hydrogen peroxide, etc... this device was part of multiple briefings prior to the comments.
He did know about this, and many other devices. your point is valid, however, ht did actually know about this technology.
I saw the video but saw it was uploaded the day before the news spun the President's comment. I thought maybe it was a troll video to show the world how dumb Trump supporters were so I looked into the company but couldn't find anything regarding the tool/technique the video was promoting.
Then I found an AP article 4 days before the President's comments which goes to show they probably informed him about it which is why he made the comments he made.
A disinfectant does not need to be a harsh chemical. A disinfectant can be heat, radiation, UV light, etc. Many people consider a lung lavage a method of disinfecting the lung by “washing” it out.
They’ve released technology that is using UV light to sterilize N95 masks due to the shortage. It’s now officially FDA approved. They have been putting babies under ultraviolet light for jaundice, for as long as I can remember. It is not new. They’re also using UV light to sterilize ambulances between runs because of the virus.
So? you're completely oblivious to the original question. The product OP posted uses UVA. Germicidal UV (UVGI) is UVC. Poster above me said he was surprised UVA was being used, which is a totally valid observation being downvoted into oblivion by Sunday retards. You countered by saying "it's used everywhere" and the example you posted, also uses UVC, not UVA. So? you proved your own point wrong.
He's getting downvoted into oblivion RIGHTLY because he made a contradictory comment without a source. This is an anonymous online forum, you can't be an authority on a topic in an online forum. YOU should be downvoting him so why aren't you?
If he wants to make that claim, then he's got to source it which is exactly why he got called out for pretending to be smarter than the doctor's at Cedars Sinai.
Next, I am incredibly curious where you came up with that this product uses UVC @ ~260nm. As far as I can find, I don't see it posted anywhere on their website. I also searched around to other documentation on the product and can't seem to find where they state this anywhere. Do you have a source for your comment about it using UVC?
Also states that UVB/UVC are the most effective. You can downvote all you want, but it doesn't change the scientific paper results
And you are getting rightfully downvoted because you are completely missing the point of using UVA.
If you want to call people out for being a sunday retard, make sure you aren't being a complete hypocrite.
So YouTube is now the UV light expert? I habe no idea if what anyone is saying is true, but they removed something someone thought was true. Kind of always happens to go one way. Always.
Really. You seem too clumsy to be a bot, so I would just say your bosses got to find a better level of shill. They are not getting their value out of you. .
If this is true you may have uncovered a set up. Somebody fed this to trump, somebody he trust, perhaps this exposes another mole. If your science is correct. We have seen this game before. Lots of down votes and I understand why, but this is all verifiable for truthfulness and we should consider that.
That title is brilliant. I mean that. If it is yours, good scalpel like rhetoric.
That title fucking hurts. I would have laughed if it wasn’t so true
The thing about YouTube's community guidelines is that they're a complete mystery. They'll remove a video for violating them, but they won't tell you what specific rule the content violates. Steven Crowder protested outside YouTube's corporate HQ after having his entire channel demonetized without being told what he did wrong. How can you expect people to follow your rules if you won't tell them what the rules even are? In reality they keep it secret like that so they can remove anything that doesn't align with their political agenda.
It's Kafkaesque. That's for sure.
Regarding the community guidelines, Youtube has already stated that that when it comes to coronavirus information, their community guidelines align with the official WHO guidelines.
So, basically...
They're a bunch of commies.
Chinese owned company backs Chinese narratives Surprised Pikachu
It’s not a bug, it’s a feature.
The rules are set up so that Keyboard Karens and Bugmen on the DNC/ShariaBlue payroll can censor content that challenges their narratives by mass reporting violations of the nebulous terms. This way YouTube/Twitter can continue to claim not to be publishers because the decision to censor is not being made by them but by the platform community.
Looks like @BioscienceAytu has had their account suspended on Twitter.
Sounds like Reddit too
They misspelled it. It supposed to say ".. for violating Communist Guidelines..."
https://youtu.be/7VwC7I66inQ It’s being reuploaded at record speed
Here too https://www.bitchute.com/video/i0pt3CqLOotm/
And here too https://streamable.com/e/w7rpbn
Keep them coming!
I reported it for inciting hate by promoting an approach by nazi president trump. I also said it triggered my PTSD from my youth when I use to get sunburn easily when playing outside all day.
Here is the company's web site. learn all you want about this technology. Trump is 100% correct. (as usual)
https://aytubio.com
Here's the thing. I actually believe that Trump did not know about this company or this technology.
But asking questions does not make him dumb. Quite the opposite. Asking questions, even questions that might initially sound crazy, is exactly what a leader is supposed to do. The people who are laughing at him for asking a question lack imagination. (And let's be real clear here, he asked a question - he didn't make a statement.) You make progress by asking questions.
These same people would have laughed at JFK for wanting to go to the moon. These leftists are "progressive" in name only, because they are not at all interested in progressing the human race forward.
He was repeating things he heard, that made him think. about UV, about Vaproizing hydrogen peroxide, etc... this device was part of multiple briefings prior to the comments.
He did know about this, and many other devices. your point is valid, however, ht did actually know about this technology.
I saw the video but saw it was uploaded the day before the news spun the President's comment. I thought maybe it was a troll video to show the world how dumb Trump supporters were so I looked into the company but couldn't find anything regarding the tool/technique the video was promoting.
Then I found an AP article 4 days before the President's comments which goes to show they probably informed him about it which is why he made the comments he made.
https://apnews.com/b44f4531071e6204023f7b8e16f59d4b?fbclid=IwAR1XHGqkx61P0q7CI0SwhuGWTpkY9wQvmetCXNtYaah-NcGqcjd_B3XPA7I
As he said they were going to look into it, because they didn't know what it was and it seemed it was possible
Brilliant Title.
Fantastic headline!
MEME IT FAR AND WIDE
"Davey". Says it all. Mommie's little basement dweller.
"Davey joins The Times from BuzzFeed News as a technology reporter covering disinformation."
KEK! She's a Keyboard Karen who made her chops whoring for clicks.
There’s a reason they made her the expert on disinformation.
It is a violation to support Trump.
Here si a great meme from here on TD. https://i.imgur.com/jSIDynz.jpg
covers the topic nicely.
Hey OP, is that your original title?
It's available on Bitshute ... https://www.bitchute.com/hashtag/uvlight/
Archive everything, and download videos.
ah, a classic appeal to authority. As if youtube has any medical doctors on staff to review such stuff.
BITCHUTE > YOUTUBE
Also available on the AYTU Bioscience website. https://aytubio.com/healight/
Load up on AYTU stocks ASAP and thank Trump for the hot tip.
Video is still down
The company is a well known company with publicly traded stocks.
Recent (1 month old) studies:
Disinfectant to clean lungs:
“Injecting light” could be referring to Ultraviolet Blood Irradiation.
Methylene blue photochemical and another light therapy studies which came out last week:
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-17718/v1
Patent filed literally 4 days ago:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1385818/000165495420004215/aytu_ex991.htm
https://apnews.com/b44f4531071e6204023f7b8e16f59d4b
Possibility of Disinfection of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) in Human Respiratory Tract by Controlled Ethanol Vapor Inhalation by Tsumoru Shintake:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.12444
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:2qsNqDrNE4wJ:https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/hydrogen-peroxide-a-potential-treatment-for-coronavirus-infection/ar-BB12qktc%20&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&fbclid=IwAR21ozTriX1ADx5-78FWJuuQ6ZmdeQlrguuYuSabNDa0Ssu9FnEybbxSdu0
UV light to treat disease in the blood: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4783265/?fbclid=IwAR38ZvMLrecqYELhkrFOBZE1-pIa3EV19Hv6JypztzNZGaLQRMiEYJzjIF0
A disinfectant does not need to be a harsh chemical. A disinfectant can be heat, radiation, UV light, etc. Many people consider a lung lavage a method of disinfecting the lung by “washing” it out.
They’ve released technology that is using UV light to sterilize N95 masks due to the shortage. It’s now officially FDA approved. They have been putting babies under ultraviolet light for jaundice, for as long as I can remember. It is not new. They’re also using UV light to sterilize ambulances between runs because of the virus.
So you’re telling us you know more than the doctors at CedarsSinai ?
hardly new, lot of sterilising cabinets are UV, EG:
https://www.mychway.com/itm/1001187.html
been around for decades.
But those use UVC @ ~260nm
so?
You don't put people in them, so no problem.
So? you're completely oblivious to the original question. The product OP posted uses UVA. Germicidal UV (UVGI) is UVC. Poster above me said he was surprised UVA was being used, which is a totally valid observation being downvoted into oblivion by Sunday retards. You countered by saying "it's used everywhere" and the example you posted, also uses UVC, not UVA. So? you proved your own point wrong.
The paper posted above: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4783265/?fbclid=IwAR38ZvMLrecqYELhkrFOBZE1-pIa3EV19Hv6JypztzNZGaLQRMiEYJzjIF0
Also states that UVB/UVC are the most effective. You can downvote all you want, but it doesn't change the scientific paper results
He's getting downvoted into oblivion RIGHTLY because he made a contradictory comment without a source. This is an anonymous online forum, you can't be an authority on a topic in an online forum. YOU should be downvoting him so why aren't you?
If he wants to make that claim, then he's got to source it which is exactly why he got called out for pretending to be smarter than the doctor's at Cedars Sinai.
Next, I am incredibly curious where you came up with that this product uses UVC @ ~260nm. As far as I can find, I don't see it posted anywhere on their website. I also searched around to other documentation on the product and can't seem to find where they state this anywhere. Do you have a source for your comment about it using UVC?
And you are getting rightfully downvoted because you are completely missing the point of using UVA.
If you want to call people out for being a sunday retard, make sure you aren't being a complete hypocrite.
"Actually..."
Nice work, Glowy.
So YouTube is now the UV light expert? I habe no idea if what anyone is saying is true, but they removed something someone thought was true. Kind of always happens to go one way. Always.
Really. You seem too clumsy to be a bot, so I would just say your bosses got to find a better level of shill. They are not getting their value out of you. .
Uncuck yourself.
Its always one way
If this is true you may have uncovered a set up. Somebody fed this to trump, somebody he trust, perhaps this exposes another mole. If your science is correct. We have seen this game before. Lots of down votes and I understand why, but this is all verifiable for truthfulness and we should consider that.