Thanks for your reply but why am I a shill for asking for this? And how are all these things linked to Q wasn't wiki leaks responsible for most of these exposures?
How come that Qanon became such a brand do you supporters of Q see it as a good or bad thing? If bad than why isn't it being called out by the movement itself or is it?
Perhaps you are not a shill, the manner in which you posted makes it appear so however; concern trolls and shills come in here often just so.
Wilikleaks became a part of it, yep. However not one person in 10000 has any idea of what Wiki is, less than that have read them. In fact no one has read them all...
That is part of what Q Anons do, we simply attempt to perform that research a Free Press used to perform for us. We no longer have a Free Press, an honest news broker, so we attempt to do that job for America.
But this is so very much bigger than mere Wikileaks. Wiki did nothing to expose the Deep State which was/is pervasive all throughout our government, all through foreign governments, all through agencies and foundations globally. It leaked some mails, yeah, but pointing mainly just to local corruptions, greed and avarice on an individual scale. Did Wiki expose the U.S. Army helicopters who conducted a black op in Los Angeles a couple years ago, under cover of an exercise? Did Wiki expose the assassination attempts made upon POTUS?
So we take the crumbs, hints in Wiki mails or clues dropped by Q/POTUS and then we try to flesh that out, run it down, go dig up the actual facts surrounding the situation. We share those and force a public recognition of reality.
Your last two questions make no sense, we are not a brand for instance. Merely Citizens who bother to ask why, who then dig up what the press will not, what corrupt government will not, what academia will not.
Citizens who cherish God and Freedom, and so who refuse to let Evil continue as it is.
And we fully understand that many people will not 'get it', very few people actually have the time or desire to dig thru this shiite. For instance I mostly refuse to dig into the child predation/trafficking, it creeps me out and so I don't dig there. Yeah it is a yuge part of the Deep State corruptions and many others DO dig there, so I don't have to. I know enough to understand it is real and wide spread, I can name some playas but I ain't spending time on that perverse Evil shiite, creeps me out.
Did Wiki expose Epstein or Schiff, Comey or Brennan?
Thanks for your reply but why am I a shill for asking for this? And how are all these things linked to Q wasn't wiki leaks responsible for most of these exposures? How come that Qanon became such a brand do you supporters of Q see it as a good or bad thing? If bad than why isn't it being called out by the movement itself or is it?
Perhaps you are not a shill, the manner in which you posted makes it appear so however; concern trolls and shills come in here often just so.
Wilikleaks became a part of it, yep. However not one person in 10000 has any idea of what Wiki is, less than that have read them. In fact no one has read them all...
That is part of what Q Anons do, we simply attempt to perform that research a Free Press used to perform for us. We no longer have a Free Press, an honest news broker, so we attempt to do that job for America.
But this is so very much bigger than mere Wikileaks. Wiki did nothing to expose the Deep State which was/is pervasive all throughout our government, all through foreign governments, all through agencies and foundations globally. It leaked some mails, yeah, but pointing mainly just to local corruptions, greed and avarice on an individual scale. Did Wiki expose the U.S. Army helicopters who conducted a black op in Los Angeles a couple years ago, under cover of an exercise? Did Wiki expose the assassination attempts made upon POTUS?
So we take the crumbs, hints in Wiki mails or clues dropped by Q/POTUS and then we try to flesh that out, run it down, go dig up the actual facts surrounding the situation. We share those and force a public recognition of reality.
Your last two questions make no sense, we are not a brand for instance. Merely Citizens who bother to ask why, who then dig up what the press will not, what corrupt government will not, what academia will not. Citizens who cherish God and Freedom, and so who refuse to let Evil continue as it is.
And we fully understand that many people will not 'get it', very few people actually have the time or desire to dig thru this shiite. For instance I mostly refuse to dig into the child predation/trafficking, it creeps me out and so I don't dig there. Yeah it is a yuge part of the Deep State corruptions and many others DO dig there, so I don't have to. I know enough to understand it is real and wide spread, I can name some playas but I ain't spending time on that perverse Evil shiite, creeps me out.
Did Wiki expose Epstein or Schiff, Comey or Brennan?
Q did, did Wiki?
https://files.catbox.moe/lmax68.jpg