When somethings out of patent and costs like $10 for a treatment plan, used for decades in combination with zinc, and a competitor of similar success costs $1000, it's really not out of the realm of possibility at all that a competitor would pay good money to see information suppressed.
Especially when we're talking mammoth contracts and dosage amounts, including future stockpiles.
What i've found so disingenuous in all this is, people you aren't necessarily politically aligned with can get sick as well, you'd still want the best for them regardless.
That in tandem with the reporting or mis-reporting, a high dose and low dose study is conducted, high dose study leads to complications and low dose study continues - headline - STUDY CANCELLED AFTER DEATHS.
or HCQ used without zinc in another one, first question should have been y u no zinc.
Developing new medicine and vaccines takes money. A cheap effective drug doesnt
When somethings out of patent and costs like $10 for a treatment plan, used for decades in combination with zinc, and a competitor of similar success costs $1000, it's really not out of the realm of possibility at all that a competitor would pay good money to see information suppressed.
Especially when we're talking mammoth contracts and dosage amounts, including future stockpiles.
What i've found so disingenuous in all this is, people you aren't necessarily politically aligned with can get sick as well, you'd still want the best for them regardless. That in tandem with the reporting or mis-reporting, a high dose and low dose study is conducted, high dose study leads to complications and low dose study continues - headline - STUDY CANCELLED AFTER DEATHS. or HCQ used without zinc in another one, first question should have been y u no zinc.