Because the left views family structure as a threat to power and (coming from a Christian, so you can ignore second half if it puts you off) know that christianity is a very powerful force in terms of bringing communities and people together and how they support/align with what the founding fathers promoted.
Because they are dependent upon, and serve, and love, and protect, and work for each other. It blows the idea that big commie governments have anything to do with “real communism” right out of the water.
this is what a lot of central and eastern europe has compared to the rest of the western world.
Morals.
they are very proud of their histories and their religions. they have a set of beliefs that they stick to as a nation and don't bow down to social justice retardation.
I have family in Poland it's they are so based it's fucking amazing
Very encouraging numbers, but that fertility rate is still quite low. Replacement rate (just replacement!) is 2.11 children per woman. Anything less than that and the population ages and declines over time or you have to import people to offset. So they have a ways to go but its definitely moving in the right direction.
If I recall, didn't they do something where if a family has 4 children, the wife lives tax free for life?
Correct me if I'm wrong but I think it was something like that.
If that's true, it makes sense financially. The number of future tax payers will far outweigh those who earn the exemption. Not to mention the other societal benefits of retaining your national identify, family values, etc. Which are INVALUABLE!
The fertility rates has been fluctuating between 1.4 and 1.6 for the last 20 years.
get it above 2.1 and I'll pop my eyes out of my head
What they should really do is make Birth control pills prescription only and make abortion Illegal,
You'll get above 2 easy, at that point women will start slut shaming each other again because being a slut now has real consequences. the rest writes itself
The government supporting family isn't directly, or even primarily, supporting Christianity. Thats a side benefit for those if they happen to be Christian. The primary purpose for supporting family is to retain national identity, and to help support future generations economically, intellectually, and culturally.
Yes. Did you my reply? I explained that... literally that's what my post addresses lol
She's explaining how it supports the Christian faith from a Christian perspective, likely for other Christians. But the policy itself isn't created specifically or solely for Christianity.
You explained you don't want the government to support faith, which as an athiest is a premise I agree with.
But I explained how the government isn't specifically supporting faith with these policies. Christianity simply receives benefit from it as a side effect, because their values of Christianity happen to align with values that make a strong country. Her saying it supports the Christian faith is her as a Christian simply saying those values align with Christianity.
It's the equivalent of a Chicken Club who meet and eat chicken every week, and Wendy's offers a free chicken nugget promotion to advertise their new spicy nuggets. They offer the promotion, not FOR the Chicken Club, but rather they want to increase sales and improve their business. The chicken club then goes to Wendy's to get the chicken. They benefit from the promotion, but the promotion isn't made to support their chicken habit.
I don't want the government to support any faith, that's not their job
What I claimed you said
you don't want the government to support faith
Unless you just randomly posted your original comment to the wrong thread unrelated to OP, your post implies you think the government is supporting faith with these policies. They aren't. It's a side effect that mutually benefits country and those who subscribe to faith.
Because the left views family structure as a threat to power and (coming from a Christian, so you can ignore second half if it puts you off) know that christianity is a very powerful force in terms of bringing communities and people together and how they support/align with what the founding fathers promoted.
Because they are dependent upon, and serve, and love, and protect, and work for each other. It blows the idea that big commie governments have anything to do with “real communism” right out of the water.
Sounds like paradise to me. I live in MA and am willing to move to be part of that.
Not a religious man myself, as I base my opinion on people on how they act, but I agree with you.
Of all the religions I know, nothing preaches virtues and togetherness like Christianity.
When Christianity is finally wiped out, and people are living in their multicultural dystopian hellscape, people will be begging to go back.
Christianity will prevail, Islam will die. I have no doubt, and I am not even very religious.
Is this before or after the useful idiot's are done away with?
this is what a lot of central and eastern europe has compared to the rest of the western world.
Morals.
they are very proud of their histories and their religions. they have a set of beliefs that they stick to as a nation and don't bow down to social justice retardation.
I have family in Poland it's they are so based it's fucking amazing
Very encouraging numbers, but that fertility rate is still quite low. Replacement rate (just replacement!) is 2.11 children per woman. Anything less than that and the population ages and declines over time or you have to import people to offset. So they have a ways to go but its definitely moving in the right direction.
Because we’re diverse and no longer have a nation.
You don't want the wrong people in the US to have more babies. Hungary is white and homogeneous, the US isn't which makes it harder.
If I recall, didn't they do something where if a family has 4 children, the wife lives tax free for life?
Correct me if I'm wrong but I think it was something like that.
If that's true, it makes sense financially. The number of future tax payers will far outweigh those who earn the exemption. Not to mention the other societal benefits of retaining your national identify, family values, etc. Which are INVALUABLE!
Because we let globohomo operatives tell us what to do.
I ask this same question every day while looking for a rock steady, God loving lady pede.
The fertility rates has been fluctuating between 1.4 and 1.6 for the last 20 years. get it above 2.1 and I'll pop my eyes out of my head
What they should really do is make Birth control pills prescription only and make abortion Illegal,
You'll get above 2 easy, at that point women will start slut shaming each other again because being a slut now has real consequences. the rest writes itself
I don't want the government to support any faith, that's not their job
The government supporting family isn't directly, or even primarily, supporting Christianity. Thats a side benefit for those if they happen to be Christian. The primary purpose for supporting family is to retain national identity, and to help support future generations economically, intellectually, and culturally.
Ok but this lady's tweet explicitly says "supports the Chritian faith."
Yes. Did you my reply? I explained that... literally that's what my post addresses lol
She's explaining how it supports the Christian faith from a Christian perspective, likely for other Christians. But the policy itself isn't created specifically or solely for Christianity.
I don't know why you're under the impression that I don't already get that
You explained you don't want the government to support faith, which as an athiest is a premise I agree with.
But I explained how the government isn't specifically supporting faith with these policies. Christianity simply receives benefit from it as a side effect, because their values of Christianity happen to align with values that make a strong country. Her saying it supports the Christian faith is her as a Christian simply saying those values align with Christianity.
It's the equivalent of a Chicken Club who meet and eat chicken every week, and Wendy's offers a free chicken nugget promotion to advertise their new spicy nuggets. They offer the promotion, not FOR the Chicken Club, but rather they want to increase sales and improve their business. The chicken club then goes to Wendy's to get the chicken. They benefit from the promotion, but the promotion isn't made to support their chicken habit.
I never claimed what you seem to think I claimed. I just commented that I don't want government to support any particular faith.
What you said
What I claimed you said
Unless you just randomly posted your original comment to the wrong thread unrelated to OP, your post implies you think the government is supporting faith with these policies. They aren't. It's a side effect that mutually benefits country and those who subscribe to faith.