"current science", "dubious testing conclusions"... instead of debating the facts, we'll just drive them over with a steamroller and maybe no one will listen to them anymore.

Those two organizations didn’t make an argument. They simply condemned the docs. It was a political statement, not a factual or scientific one.

If these organizations want to be taken seriously, then they should rebut the arguments rather than simply appeal to authority (“argumentum ad verecundiam”). Point out the errors the docs made, if any.

Personally I do think these docs erred in extrapolating positive test percentages to the general population, because the only people being tested have significant symptoms, whereas the general population does not. But the truth is the actual percentages of people who had the virus at some point are likely close to what these docs say because the majority of those infected are asymptomatic.

They will be utterly destroyed by corrupt Democrat bureaucrats.

Any time you see "experts say", immediately start to doubt the legitimacy of what comes after. It's the media's way of deliberately cloaking what is actually a miscreant.

We had this problem during the first 30 years of the telephone....censorship by private exchanges.

We can apply these proven protection laws to the modern-day 21st Century Private exchanges — the social media platforms.

In fact, we could even have public-sector replacements for FB, Twitter, IG, Reddit, NextDoor, etc — that is like a telephone number — can not be censored, suspended, banned, etc.

"Because they share our opinion we call them experts."

They rule us with fear. The nessesity of this will compell the Tyrants to try and punish these Doctors.. Thats what makes the Doctors brave "they know" and we all Know what happens to those who question the ruling class's proclomations.