2194
Comments (69)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
28
Thenew23rd 28 points ago +28 / -0

They media can't sweep crap under the rug like they used to. @Jack cannot censor every tweet about Tara Reade. This is not going away.

But before it's all over, Biden will.

24
NoSteppy1776 24 points ago +24 / -0

Was just arguing with a cuck about this on the twitters. He was pointing out that women deserve to be believed, but also men deserve due process. I said while that is certainly true under the law, after the way they treated Kavanaugh before his first name became Justice, that is NOT how it's going to go in the court of public opinion.

Those faggots brought this on themselves. We're going to make them eat this. We will make them choke on it.

17
Thenew23rd 17 points ago +17 / -0

They made jackasses of themselves with the Kavanaugh hearings. Now it's coming back to bite them.

As well it should.

18
deleted 18 points ago +18 / -0
6
Thenew23rd 6 points ago +6 / -0

Tbh I doubt the DNC knew about Tara Reade before they finessed Biden to the head of the pack. Somehow or other they imagined they could minimize the child sniffing and Hunter's scandals.

But Tara Reade changes the calculus. I believe now that they will try to swap Joe out during the convention. That's really their only hope.

8
45fan 8 points ago +8 / -0

"How Bernie still has a chance!'

5
Thenew23rd 5 points ago +5 / -0

😅😂🤣

5
Kolob 5 points ago +5 / -0

They knew there were women even if they did not know who

2
IvIA6A 2 points ago +2 / -0

They either didn't care and just maliciously looked at polls on who could "beat Donald Trump" and Biden would be a figurehead for the VP that will be running things

or

Biden is the fall guy. A McCain figure after Bush screwed things up, or feckless Romney type that wouldn't fight against Obama after 4 years of shitty policy. They were there not to provide opposition, but to wait until the pendulum swung the other way and they can get their younger full marxist, communist candidate after Trump.

1
Thenew23rd 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think it was the first one. Democrats have convinced themselves that they can win in November. So it was a matter of picking the strongest candidate. Unfortunately for them, they had the weakest primary field in history. They thought Biden was the safest candidate in a very bad lineup.

But he wouldn't stop sniffing kids, his cognitive functions are declining, and Tara Reade has taken a wrecking ball to the campaign. It's coming unglued at the seams.

8
HockeyMom4Trump 8 points ago +8 / -0

That’s probably why they are trotting our Hillary again. She will take over for Biden when he gets bounced.

6
Thenew23rd 6 points ago +6 / -0

Why would the DNC turn to a two time loser who has spent the last three years whining and crying? People can't stand her. [And remember: Hillary's ratings are always highest when she's not running. As soon as she declares herself a candidate, her favorables invariably crash ]

Hillary Clinton's Favorable Rating Still Low

https://news.gallup.com/poll/243242/snapshot-hillary-clinton-favorable-rating-low.aspx

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Former Secretary of State HillaryClinton's favorability with U.S. adults is unchanged from last November -- remaining at a record low (36%). These results, from a Sept. 4-12 Gallup poll, confirm that Clinton's image remains in a rut nearly two years after she lost the presidential contest in 2016.

5
HockeyMom4Trump 5 points ago +5 / -0

Look, it's the DNC and they think she's amazing. They don't have much to work with.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
Thenew23rd 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's true. But after I posted the first poll a found another from a similar timeframe that had her at 27% approval. Cuomo can beat that on a bad day.