Ah, I'm going to teach you something now. I'm going to teach you to use your brain. It's not much to work with, but perhaps you'll manage?
Try to follow this:
I said Musk is a fraud.
You said that Musk created multi-billion dollar companies in plenty of industries and succeeded. Therefore he's not a fraud, according to you.
I used Enron and Theranos as examples of once-successful companies that truly were frauds. In the midst of their success, someone like you would use the same argument you did to denigrate anyone who criticized them. (In fact, that happened plenty of times at least with Theranos and their female CEO who was untouchable in the media for reasons you surely understand.)
In other words, your argument is invalid. I'm not equating Tesla to Enron. I'm saying that Tesla's success has absolutely no bearing on them being a fraud or not.
Can you understand that?
Can you understand I wasn't listing "random shit" now? I used them as an example to show that your argument is stupid.
You're actually dumber than I thought. I did not make the argument that a single company having short term success equated to it being legitimate.
I made the argument that MUSK (a person, not a company) created MULTIPLE successful companies in MULTIPLE industries and therefore HE is not a fraud.
Even still, when Musk sold Paypal to Ebay it went through a full audit and was found to be legitimate before the sale.
Both SpaceX and Tesla have been through full audits due to their connection with the government (SpaceX gov contracts, Tesla Gov loans which were paid back in full before any other auto maker fyi) and found to be legitimate.
So you're entire argument is bullshit and shows just how ignorant you are on this topic.
Educate yourself before spouting off your ill informed opinions in a public space, you may save yourself some embarrassment.
Ah, I'm going to teach you something now. I'm going to teach you to use your brain. It's not much to work with, but perhaps you'll manage?
Try to follow this:
I said Musk is a fraud.
You said that Musk created multi-billion dollar companies in plenty of industries and succeeded. Therefore he's not a fraud, according to you.
I used Enron and Theranos as examples of once-successful companies that truly were frauds. In the midst of their success, someone like you would use the same argument you did to denigrate anyone who criticized them. (In fact, that happened plenty of times at least with Theranos and their female CEO who was untouchable in the media for reasons you surely understand.)
In other words, your argument is invalid. I'm not equating Tesla to Enron. I'm saying that Tesla's success has absolutely no bearing on them being a fraud or not.
Can you understand that?
Can you understand I wasn't listing "random shit" now? I used them as an example to show that your argument is stupid.
Cool.
You're actually dumber than I thought. I did not make the argument that a single company having short term success equated to it being legitimate.
I made the argument that MUSK (a person, not a company) created MULTIPLE successful companies in MULTIPLE industries and therefore HE is not a fraud.
Even still, when Musk sold Paypal to Ebay it went through a full audit and was found to be legitimate before the sale.
Both SpaceX and Tesla have been through full audits due to their connection with the government (SpaceX gov contracts, Tesla Gov loans which were paid back in full before any other auto maker fyi) and found to be legitimate.
So you're entire argument is bullshit and shows just how ignorant you are on this topic.
Educate yourself before spouting off your ill informed opinions in a public space, you may save yourself some embarrassment.