Ok, you may have a point that people born from '46-64 grew up with TV and haven't adjusted to "life after Television." (a book title by George Gilder, born in 1939) Data may support that, on average, my generation may still watch TV more than younger generations, especially those that grew up after the internet was created. Not surprising, really; but you're still wrong to generalize like this. I am by no means the only baby boomer that hasn't watched TV since they first scrambled the broadcast. What year was that?
Google is "captured infrastructure." Most websites are. Very little social media isn't. I'd hope it's obvious that the main reason we're here and the main reason this website exists is we aren't "captured." We don't have data on our membership, but a lot of baby boomers are here. You'd be surprised how many don't watch TV. Hopefully it remains true that gen Z doesn't watch TV much if at all. Even though it's not really agreed upon yet when gen Z starts or ends.
There's always been a "generation gap" but realize the obsession on it is just another globalist divide and conquer strategy, to get Americans to hate one another. They'd love it if we devolved into Civil War. Let's not fall into their trap, ok?
We have no business in the UN and it's a travesty China was ever allowed in. Globalists have wanted to bring the US population to our knees economically since 1913. In January I never would've believed they could have us this close this soon. Their plan from the beginning was to get our national debt so out of whack with our gdp that everybody knows we can never pay it back. Then all our stuff belongs to those who own the Fed, our USD is worthless, and they impose OWG (One World Government.) Preferably without a single shot being fired. They get us to willingly forfeit everything this Nation ever stood for in exchange for some gibs. Again, in January I never would have believed they'd get us so close to this point, especially so soon.
Around 1946 they openly announced that they will have OWG whether we cooperate, or whether they have to impose it by force. Look what happened in 1918 in Russia; soldiers outnumbered people in their homes, one home at a time. Until the whole nation had fallen and it was the USSR. Those that cooperated peacefully lived to regret it. We could win at that juncture but only by fighting to the death to inflict casualties every time they attempted anything, until they run out of people willing to try. It's a grim victory, the costliest possible. We could win in November by physically preventing people carrying in fraudulent boxes of mail in ballots, but that is fraught with problems. Even worse if we go 1776 after the fraud is apparent and election results have been announced. The thing we can do that makes the most sense to me has a far better outcome, lasting results, and a far less costly victory that might not even see anybody get hurt. Please critique it? Physical removal of all Governors repeating Cuomo's mistake of denying medicine to the sick. All on the same day. They're mass murderers, and need to stand trial for it. Citizen’s arrest is legal when we stop a felony in progress. You can tell if your Governor is a mass murderer by looking at the number of people recovered in your State compared to dead and total cases. It's obvious when Trump pills aren't being given to people, even though the Governor hasn't officially declared that as policy. Give Trump pills to people as soon as they’re diagnosed positive and the death rate is reduced by 38 x compared to the National average. (Or compare to SD) Plus most people are virus-free in 6 days.
Governors get due process which gives us time to also charge them with their every other act of tyranny. People get medicine, this crisis is brought under control, people are back to work in about a week. Should've happened already, by Governors not being mass murderers.
The only legitimacy any government ever had on this continent was the consent of the governed. Do we consent to THIS?
Ok, you may have a point that people born from '46-64 grew up with TV and haven't adjusted to "life after Television." (a book title by George Gilder, born in 1939) Data may support that, on average, my generation may still watch TV more than younger generations, especially those that grew up after the internet was created. Not surprising, really; but you're still wrong to generalize like this. I am by no means the only baby boomer that hasn't watched TV since they first scrambled the broadcast. What year was that?
Google is "captured infrastructure." Most websites are. Very little social media isn't. I'd hope it's obvious that the main reason we're here and the main reason this website exists is we aren't "captured." We don't have data on our membership, but a lot of baby boomers are here. You'd be surprised how many don't watch TV. Hopefully it remains true that gen Z doesn't watch TV much if at all. Even though it's not really agreed upon yet when gen Z starts or ends.
There's always been a "generation gap" but realize the obsession on it is just another globalist divide and conquer strategy, to get Americans to hate one another. They'd love it if we devolved into Civil War. Let's not fall into their trap, ok?
We have no business in the UN and it's a travesty China was ever allowed in. Globalists have wanted to bring the US population to our knees economically since 1913. In January I never would've believed they could have us this close this soon. Their plan from the beginning was to get our national debt so out of whack with our gdp that everybody knows we can never pay it back. Then all our stuff belongs to those who own the Fed, our USD is worthless, and they impose OWG (One World Government.) Preferably without a single shot being fired. They get us to willingly forfeit everything this Nation ever stood for in exchange for some gibs. Again, in January I never would have believed they'd get us so close to this point, especially so soon.
Around 1946 they openly announced that they will have OWG whether we cooperate, or whether they have to impose it by force. Look what happened in 1918 in Russia; soldiers outnumbered people in their homes, one home at a time. Until the whole nation had fallen and it was the USSR. Those that cooperated peacefully lived to regret it. We could win at that juncture but only by fighting to the death to inflict casualties every time they attempted anything, until they run out of people willing to try. It's a grim victory, the costliest possible. We could win in November by physically preventing people carrying in fraudulent boxes of mail in ballots, but that is fraught with problems. Even worse if we go 1776 after the fraud is apparent and election results have been announced. The thing we can do that makes the most sense to me has a far better outcome, lasting results, and a far less costly victory that might not even see anybody get hurt. Please critique it? Physical removal of all Governors repeating Cuomo's mistake of denying medicine to the sick. All on the same day. They're mass murderers, and need to stand trial for it. Citizen’s arrest is legal when we stop a felony in progress. You can tell if your Governor is a mass murderer by looking at the number of people recovered in your State compared to dead and total cases. It's obvious when Trump pills aren't being given to people, even though the Governor hasn't officially declared that as policy. Give Trump pills to people as soon as they’re diagnosed positive and the death rate is reduced by 38 x compared to the National average. (Or compare to SD) Plus most people are virus-free in 6 days.
Governors get due process which gives us time to also charge them with their every other act of tyranny. People get medicine, this crisis is brought under control, people are back to work in about a week. Should've happened already, by Governors not being mass murderers.
The only legitimacy any government ever had on this continent was the consent of the governed. Do we consent to THIS?
King George never engaged in this much tyranny.