2435
What difference does it make? (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by TexSolo ago by TexSolo +2435 / -0
Comments (68)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-4
yesminister -4 points ago +2 / -6

Never said he couldn't. One makes you a bad president, one makes you a bad person.

Also, she didn't accuse him of rape, did she? Just some touching?

2
jgardner 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tara Reade said he raped her. Any sexual contact between a superior and an inferior is rape because of the power dynamic. (This is basic HR stuff 101.) Furthermore, when she complained, she was fired.

-5
yesminister -5 points ago +2 / -7

lol "power dynamic"

Am I on reddit?

0
jgardner 0 points ago +1 / -1

Dude, if you have relations with your underlings, that's rape. It's always been that way. It was considered rape back in the 18th Century, rape back in the 5th Century, and rape back before then too.

Have you heard of "statutory rape"? If you're ALONE with an underage female, it's considered rape whether or not you touched her. Those laws have been on the books for a very long time too.

It seems weird to hear about VP Pence not eating dinner alone with other women one-on-one, but he's practicing something that we've been doing as a society since, I don't know, a thousand years?

Our society has shifted in a big way recently, and we can't even remember what morality looks like anymore. This fake pseudo-marxist crap uses words that we've had since the beginning and then perverts them.

-8
yesminister -8 points ago +1 / -9

What the fuck are you on about? You sound like you belong on tumblr or something. Having relations with an employee is RAPE? That's not true anywhere in the world. We would have crazy amounts of rapists then, and we would have destroyed the meaning of the word.

And no, statutory rape is not "being alone with an underage female". That would mean every parent and teacher and probably everyone else on earth is a statutory rapist.

It's not rape unless you fuck someone against their will. Biden felt her up a little and complimented her on her legs. Big fucking deal.

2
TexSolo [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1

Do you work for CNN?

-5
yesminister -5 points ago +1 / -6

I'm the only one here without hypocrisy, and I'm the one working for CNN? Right...

Why should we believe this slut when we didn't believe the other one? Hypocrisy.

5
TexSolo [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

You're actually comparing Tara Reade to Blase' Ford? Really? One has multiple people that have verified she told them years ago when it happened. There is a record in Biden's senate papers but he won't release them. There is a phone call where her mother confirmed the accusations 30 years ago. The other is a known liar, drunk and everyone that she said was there, says they weren't and that she's full of shit. Even her own family have disowned her and won't talk with her because they know she's a fraud. Come on maaaaaan.

-6
yesminister -6 points ago +1 / -7

I don't caaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaare.

So he felt up a woman five hundred years ago. That shit was barely frowned upon back then. It's not rape and it doesn't make him a bad president. Do you think he will run around-- ok, I stop myself in the middle of this sentence because yeah, he WILL probably run around feeling up women and sniffing their hair, so I'll give that point to you.

Even so, fuck women who think they can bring down powerful men decades after the fact. We, as a society, should not care about an accusation like this. Every man will be brought down by these sorts of accusations in the future, and already is to some extent.