Because they probably put it there for a good reason. I don't know how vaccines are made exactly, so it would be retarded for me to look at the list of "ingredients" and have opinions about it. Same goes for you.
Why did the supreme court legally classify vaccines as "unavoidably unsafe". Why can't vaccine manufacturers be held liable for any damage caused by their product?
The answer to your first question is that they didn't.
Here's the full quote (from Justice Scalia):
the Act expressly eliminates liability for a vaccine’s unavoidable, adverse side effects: “No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings
In other words, if the warnings about the side effects are properly given, the vaccine manufacturer should not be held liable for those side effects. Seems pretty reasonable, doesn't it? We all know vaccines and medication have side effects. You can't sue the company that produced your medication for a side effect it listed.
"You can't sue the company that produced your medication for a side effect it listed"
Thats not why pharm companies cant be sued. Our government gave them immunity from lawsuits. They also allowed them to fast track vaccines rather than have the same testing requirements that other pharmaceuticals have.
I don't know. It's probably easy to find out. Why assume it's bad?
Because they probably put it there for a good reason. I don't know how vaccines are made exactly, so it would be retarded for me to look at the list of "ingredients" and have opinions about it. Same goes for you.
Why did the supreme court legally classify vaccines as "unavoidably unsafe". Why can't vaccine manufacturers be held liable for any damage caused by their product?
The answer to your first question is that they didn't.
Here's the full quote (from Justice Scalia):
In other words, if the warnings about the side effects are properly given, the vaccine manufacturer should not be held liable for those side effects. Seems pretty reasonable, doesn't it? We all know vaccines and medication have side effects. You can't sue the company that produced your medication for a side effect it listed.
"You can't sue the company that produced your medication for a side effect it listed"
Thats not why pharm companies cant be sued. Our government gave them immunity from lawsuits. They also allowed them to fast track vaccines rather than have the same testing requirements that other pharmaceuticals have.