2845
Comments (254)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-5
doug2 -5 points ago +3 / -8

He also helped cover up the murder of seth Rich and blamed it on russia despite knowing the truth. There is that... but hey he wanted to cover his own ass must he a great guy

9
deleted 9 points ago +10 / -1
9
ADAM_SCHITT 9 points ago +9 / -0

The murder of Seth Rich is not a small sliver, it is fucking massive. If it turns out that Seth Rich leaked the DNC emails rather than the Russians hacking them, it means the entire narrative that Russia "interfered" in our election was made up. They turned our country upside-down because of that bullshit. And then on top of that, you have a murder by the DNC/deep state/whoever to cover it up.

3
ThrupleBlindStudy 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s clear that he leaked them. That was proven by thousands of IT people back a few days after the emails were dropped by Wikileaks.

However, all that needs to be done is to prove to the public that he leaked the emails and the whole thing comes crashing down. It doesn’t matter if the murder is solved or not.

The people who killed Seth were probably dead themselves within hours or days of the killing. His murder will never be solved.

But, his murder doesn’t need to be solved to finish off what he started. The actions he took were more important than his life, as sad as it is to say.

The important thing is to prove what he did, not how he died. In that sense, his death is a small part of the story, like the deaths of all patriots who pay the ultimate price for their country. No one knows exactly who fired the bullet or who ordered the shots, but everyone knows what those patriots did, and that’s what matters.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
3
SpaFixr 3 points ago +3 / -0

You ever actually doubt the Russian narrative was made up? I sure didn’t.

1
ADAM_SCHITT 1 point ago +1 / -0

No but we still don't have 100% definitive proof. However they also don't have 100% definitive proof that Russia did the hacking (or even close to it) but that hasn't stopped them from running with it.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
ADAM_SCHITT 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not to the general public. If we had definitive proof that Seth Rich was the leaker, then it would be.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
Pray4USA 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have never heard this before. How do you know this? I’m still freaking out that the DNC was never charged with his murder. The Awan brothers got away with murder too!!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
ehsubs 1 point ago +1 / -0

And how does that have anything to do with my comment?

2
doug2 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just want to get to the truth of the matter. That's all I care about at all. So I wasn't trying to argue with you. It is one of the things about this case that still baffles me. Why would Rogers do something so anti deep state and pro swamp draining trump, while at the same time push information he knew was false about Russia hacking the DNC despite knowing Seth was the source... I think the Mike Rogers hero story is not nearly as straightforward as we all believe.

I post here to get to the truth.. maybe someone had an explanation I hadn't thought of that they would respond with.. maybe almost no one else knows Roger's was lying about Russia to cover up for the Rich ordeal. If that's what happens then I will present my evidence as to why I believe that this is true, and more Pedes will know the truth going forward. Maybe they'll figure it out one day and it will get back to me. I only care about one thing, finding out the truth. Not that i found it, just that we, as a community, eventually gets the full fucking story to a high degree of certainty. I've already made serious progress by myself with no investigative training or help, just me and my laptop. I think we can get there.

This attitude is how I now KNOW Seth Rich was the source. I don't know if we will ever officially hear that, even from Trump. I hope and actually see some signs that we might. But we will see. The DOJ has a non prosecution agreement if the crime is committed in the interest of national security.. so they might be treating this like a policy dispute. Dissidents are murdered all the time by the IC and the DOJ legally can not prosecute them for it if it can be shown it was in the interest of protecting national security. I'd say this fits, seeing as he could have been trying to get them to a foreign nation or something, they did not know. I don't think this should be a thing, but it is, so they could use this as justification and criminal charges wouldn't even be an option. Fired? Sure. That's about it. This has gone long enough. I've made my point, lmk if you have any thoughts or questions lol.